2007-04-21 21:08:16 · 13 answers · asked by SREE 1 in Sports ➔ Cricket
Selection needs more surgery than it has done. The board is full of politicians who have an eye on their regions and votes.
If you drop one player, there is a furore in the parliament and when a match is played in that region the crowd jeers the home team and applauds the opponent team. With this mindset, you cannot be a world champion.
2007-04-29 02:17:30 · answer #1 · answered by Satya R 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You cannot afford to go on doing experimentation when a major tournament like World Cup was round the corner. Although some experiments were made by taking Suresh Raina and Irfan Pathan in the team, both did not capitalise the opportunities given to them. Rebuilding of a team is a long process and you cannot change a team overnight. All changes should be gradully done in a phased manner. Since the next world cup is in 2011, there is sufficient time to rebuild the team and make the team strong before the world cup.
2007-04-22 20:29:57 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, this "touch ups" would help the Indian team to show another shameful result in Bangladesh. The Idiotic decisions like selecting rahul as captain and dropping "Greats" like Sourav and Sachin Will be very much costly.
Do not be jealous. Think for the betterment of "Team India". we want to see the performance of the golden days of 2000-2005.
2007-04-22 10:04:09 · answer #3 · answered by Gautam B 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I am with you too, but the touch ups really didn't do anything to the ok-bad players which isn't good. They made sucha big hype of it yet they lost and are probably going to be booed by the country. THey really did keep experimenting but nothing worked to well.
2007-04-28 18:45:41 · answer #4 · answered by Shreya 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes u r right .i aggre with u because by this they must won the world cup .&be the best team like austrilia.
2007-04-27 08:52:28 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Truly yes
2007-04-25 02:29:34 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
no i dont. any given team should perform well , win or lose.
why should there be so much emphasis on winning. what about good performance? after all a win is a product of a good performance.
2007-04-29 11:57:33 · answer #7 · answered by sagar 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
some more changes were still to be made
2007-04-29 06:14:27 · answer #8 · answered by dhruv m 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
but still some more changes were required to be done
2007-04-22 04:16:55 · answer #9 · answered by Paresh P 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋
you are completely right......they kept exprerimenting till the end....
2007-04-28 13:23:19 · answer #10 · answered by braggy 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋