Again to be re-organize in any other country this year in the month of Nov./Dec 2007 .
2007-04-21 20:05:58 · 16 answers · asked by deepaklbhatia 3 in Sports ➔ Cricket
It is not all that bad.Still the conditions are the same for all the teams.A good team should be able to win on any pitch and under any conditions.
Six sixes in six balls.
Four wickets in four balls.
The above world cup records are the answers to your question.
2007-04-21 22:18:11 · answer #1 · answered by karikalan 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are talking things beyond logic. No one can blame the pitches as many centuries have been scored in these pitches and no participant country has raised any adverse remarks about the pitches. It is not at all correct that good players could not perform well, as Mathew Hayden, Rickyt Ponting, S.T. Jayasuriya, Kelvin Pietersen, Scot Styrish etc. have performed well in this tournament. Just because players from your own country could not perform well, you cannot call the pitches bad.
2007-04-22 13:43:28 · answer #2 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
What a load of rubbish,Some teams are managing to play great cricket regardless of weather or pitch.
Some are just looking for excuses for teams that didn't perform well. A good player can play well under any conditions
2007-04-22 01:36:47 · answer #3 · answered by tuppenybitz 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
NO
Just because, guessing from your name, your country didn't even make the Super 8s doesn't make it a bad world cup.
The top 4 1 day nations have made the Semis, so how can it be Null & Void
2007-04-21 20:10:37 · answer #4 · answered by Weatherman 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You are absolutetly correct 2007 world cup cricket is Null & Void for Indian/Pakistan Fans due to following reason ;
-Sachin,Lara,Inzmam,Flintoff not played/Performed well in this cup and their team out so early.
-reason was only that they didn't played good.
-other players like hayden,murali,jayasuriya,kevin pieterson,Ponting,Scott Styris,Hershelle Gibbs are playing as evergreen.
so finally it is to be said ,its a good enough to not be allowed for re-organised.
2007-04-25 08:49:28 · answer #5 · answered by bhalla 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
You are partly right regarding the structuring of the format where good teams were eleminated in few matches in the preliminary round, however we cannot take away credit from the good innings of some players and classic team displays also.
2007-04-21 20:34:31 · answer #6 · answered by Santosh 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Not always, true. Look at Mathew Hayden. He is in solid form, you see. (It is not easy to score 3 centuries and 1 half century in a single world cup, wherever it is).
2007-04-21 21:58:39 · answer #7 · answered by Vijay_Srini 3 · 2⤊ 0⤋
read about the GAME of cricket - a game played by gentlemen, in a manner befitting gentlemen, regardless of pitch, weather or outcome - one would shake hands with the opposite team and RETIRE to the dressing room as either...a winner or loser, more importantly......... always as a gentleman!
2007-04-22 00:12:33 · answer #8 · answered by renclrk 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
The venues were fine and there are great teams out there who will still be fighting for the top spot....dont count out this WC just because your team is sh***t.
2007-04-22 03:06:13 · answer #9 · answered by Roscait 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
neah yaar! sab countries ki board politics, india ke sade hue us greg coach aur match fixing is reason for pathetic world cup ever ,yak!!
2007-04-21 20:20:37 · answer #10 · answered by knights 1 · 0⤊ 1⤋