English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

When should we take Bush and his gouverment to trial for the lies. they lie about irac said they had anything to do about 9/11. theu lied said irac had weapon of mass destruction. they attack a contry that had done nothing to them in years. the list goes on

2007-04-21 17:49:25 · 28 answers · asked by carina blubba 2 in Politics & Government Politics

Harley hmm i mention a few lies. that we all know about if you dont belive he lie well just keep on closing your eyes

2007-04-21 17:55:50 · update #1

mr.phatt… sorry my spelling but maybe you not know this but not every human has english as there native language. Or maybe you wanna sell something to me in norwegian

2007-04-21 18:07:56 · update #2

mr.phatt… sorry my spelling but maybe you not know this but not every human has english as there native language. Or maybe you wanna sell something to me in norwegian

2007-04-21 18:08:16 · update #3

seanpatr… wow so mature attacking me for my weight. it has nothing to do about the issue.

2007-04-21 18:14:07 · update #4

28 answers

Absolutely!

Those of you who don't believe he has lied just aren't paying attention. Wake up!

2007-04-21 17:53:53 · answer #1 · answered by plumrj 2 · 4 9

I think the Democrats have too slim of a majority for anything to happen or for any accountability to occur. I think right now they know you cant cry over spilt milk so I think they are more focused on damage control. That seanpat or whatever his name is just some old grumpy bitter man so pay no attention to old bitter men.

2007-04-22 13:22:35 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

Bush lied about nothing. You have such a hatred for this country, the military, and the government that you would trump up lies and accusations just to make yourself sound like an idiot. I was in Iraq. I know what it is like there and how the people were before we got there and now. If you were told the real story, then you would know there was alot of crap there that you have no frickin' clue. You follow what the fat, Liberal newscasters tell you is news. IT IS NOT NEWS!!!!!!!!! It is their pathetic opinions.

Secondly, I hope to hell that isn't really you in that picture. If it is, you seriously need to redirect your energy on excercise and not sitting on your fat azz in front of a computer screen or in your chair renovated from an old couch to conform over your huge azz cheeks while eating cheetos and ding dongs becoming even more stupider than you sound right now. For your sake, I hope you do.

2007-04-21 18:05:36 · answer #3 · answered by seanpatrick77 2 · 6 3

Talk about bad spelling and grammar, anyways, you are apparently a conspiracy nut. You know, Bush has not lied, you guys just try to blame him for every little problem that goes on in your pathetic little lives. Also, aren't you one of those people that also calls him an idiot? Talk about hypocritical! Oh, by the way, found your tin foil hat, better come and get it.
Oh I see how it is, give Mr. Phatt all the credit, how about a little here?

2007-04-21 18:00:55 · answer #4 · answered by Chase 5 · 5 2

Umm first you can't spell Iraq. Second, Saddam did have WMDs, we found a huge chemical weapons factory, empty, because he had sent all the chemicals to Syria. We also know he bombed the Kurds with chemical weapons. Also, Saddam had a working relationship with Bin Laden since 1998. Also, Bill Clinton's administration had already been planning a war in Iraq, but George Bush was the one to initiate it. Speaking of Bill Clinton, Lying also isn't against the law. Purgury, lying under oath, is.

2007-04-21 17:57:11 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 7 3

Name one actual lie. Not a make believe one, or ones that you wish happened but an actual lie. You can't put someone on trial or impeach them because things aren't going your way.

Additional: I hate to burst your bubble, but 9/11 was real, WMD's have been found....Saddam used them on the Kurds, over 500 found since 2003 and we didn't attack Iraq, we went after terrorists in Iraq. You can keep your head in the sand if you want, but you are not doing yourself any good. I have doubts if you are even American.

2007-04-21 17:51:54 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 10 4

Presidents never go to trial. For god sakes in my eyes Mr. Clinton was worse of a man lying to the American people before the court! If that was me or you we would have been arrested on perjury!

2007-04-21 17:54:57 · answer #7 · answered by DeputyJT 3 · 5 3

What lies? If President Bush lied, he would have been impeached long ago, grow up and stop listening to failed talking points from idiots. Use your brain for more than a dandruff collection.

2007-04-21 17:53:40 · answer #8 · answered by great_american2006 2 · 7 4

No, he didn't lie.

Harley is right, don't use any made up lies. I have heard all of the accusations without proof. He didn't lie about WMD's, the intel was there, even Clinton and congress believed there were WMD's.

2007-04-21 17:51:46 · answer #9 · answered by TE 5 · 8 4

Clearly that GED was a bit beyond your reach.....as is your grasp of the political situation in IraQ.

Might try the Spell Check though.

2007-04-21 17:56:16 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 7 3

I did not have sex with that woman!

There have been no lies since the Clinton's stole all the China and silverware and left the White House. The Dems just can't sit still since there have been ZERO scandals in thw White House since Monica-gate !

Pretty pic !

2007-04-21 17:52:26 · answer #11 · answered by ValleyR 7 · 10 4

fedest.com, questions and answers