One of your answers says NO because it doesn't have what it takes to sustain human life.
As I sit and read the contents of my can of Generic Cat Food it certainly has more in it than I even thought. . . .
Beef Poultry By Products
Fish Liver
Meat By Products , Potassium Chloride
Vitamins E and A Supplements
B12 Supplements, Niacin Supplements
Riboflavin Supplements, D Calcium Supplements
among other things. . . how do they get it all in one little can?
I would say that with a little salt and pepper it could and would sustain human life and the sad thing about it,with the ever increasing cost of living and no significant increase in minimum wage or Social Security,there are plenty of people who DO sustain their lives on not only Cat Food but Dog Food as well.
As a kid growing up,my Dad even had us kids to try some dry dog food,telling us that a person could survive on just about anything when they need to.
2007-04-21 17:31:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by Just Q 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
\have you seen some of the cat foods that are out now? some of them look better than people food. and yes humans could exist on eating cat food. it has vitamins in it. i hope no one ever has to live off of cat food, i know i don't want to, but it won't hurt you.
2007-04-21 17:06:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by blueeyes 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
Perhaps I might answer your question stated thusly:
"Do humans have the same dietary requirements as house cats?"
We don't. It's not a matter of quantity. For example, unlike cats, people can't synthesize vitamin C; we must consume it from an outside source. Vitamin C deficiency, scurvy, is invariably fatal.
2007-04-22 03:56:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by jtrusnik 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
it somewhat is robust! the biggest distinction is: Conservatives have self assurance in God, smaller government, and private accountability. Liberals go through a psychological illness and have self assurance (examine as dream) that the State (i.e. government) would desire to play the situation of God with the intention to create a Heaven in the worldwide (the place there isn't any choose for inner maximum accountability b/c the government will make all alternatives for all persons). i'm exceedingly confident that's what the story above gets at.
2016-12-10 08:19:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Why of course ,let's say if you're eating whiskas or pedigree ,you'll be just find ,the food containts 50% extra fiber ,mineral and other thing like 30 % fish oil that will make your fur grow better ,but cat's fur ,i guess ,wait...you're not going to eat that stuff ,right ?
2007-04-21 17:14:20
·
answer #5
·
answered by Michael J 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
I hope you aren't planning on testing this theory. There are things in it that they need for their digestive systems. That being said, there are things missing in there, as well as things in there that humans are not meant to have as part of their diet. Bonemeal, for instance, is something that cats need as part of their diet (ground up bones) and it is a normal ingredient found in their food.
2007-04-21 19:48:41
·
answer #6
·
answered by Kati B 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
Yes as there is nutritional value in the pet food. Do we want to is another question entirely, but it would be possible. Some homeless people actually do live on pet food.
2007-04-21 17:18:57
·
answer #7
·
answered by captainjackswench 4
·
0⤊
1⤋
You want Fries with that ?
2007-04-21 17:01:32
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
nutritionally? yes
2007-04-21 17:08:41
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
No it doesnt have all that we need
2007-04-21 17:01:06
·
answer #10
·
answered by zan j 2
·
1⤊
1⤋