Should the federal government be so large, or should it be smaller? why?

Answer 1

I think it should change according to the population. If the population is large i.e America it should have 1 person in the house of representatives for every 'x' amount of people. So the every politician has to serve the same amount of people. The same if the population becomes smaller.

To most other people: Your answers kind of suck. Everyone is saying " the government needs to be smaller and more efficient". Its not that simple. You can't just click your fingers and the government will become better. No matter how many people are in government it will still act at the same rate and will the produce the same amount of laws. You need to tell us how the government can become more efficient.

Answer 2

Good question.....
Of course all of the supposedly conservative Republicans will answer smaller. Yet the Federal Bureacracy grew faster under Reagan and Bush than at any time since World War II.
The Republicans only do lip service to Conservative Principles.

Answer 3

I have one credo: "The larger any organization, corporation or government gets, the less manageable it becomes, and the fewer people benefit from it."
The U.S. government needs to be cut by as much as 90% because as much as 90% of all federal government activities is not chartered in our Constitution, and should not be mandated as part of the government's power structure. Politicians have long forgotten that their role is that of public servants - they should answer to the people, even in a Republic. If America was a true democracy, the government would answer to the people who would rul, and their elected representatives would have no power other than to do the people's bidding. -RKO- 04/21/07

Answer 4

Smaller, leaner, and more efficient. Big government is wasteful and self-perpetuating. The beast's appetite for our tax money knows no bounds, and all should not forget that.

Nobody spends our money more inefficiently than our Congress. The only way to control their spending is to not give them the money in the first place.

Almost, like taking crack away from crack-heads.

Answer 5

each and each of the above, reckoning on the region. a lot smaller even as it consists of stuff like TSA and position of beginning protection, and different such nonsense. a lot more beneficial even as it consists of regulating Wall street. I type of accept as true with Andy... would not ensue frequently. yet he's proper about the protection stress. i ought to reduce that via 80 5%, strengthen Social protection and Medicare some, and use something to pay down the debt.

Answer 6

It should be smaller. Large governments infringe on the rights of it's citizens. God gave us ten rules to live by that should be enough.

Answer 7

I don't know if it should be smaller or larger but it should be more efficient in running our country

Answer 8

bureaucracies multiply themselves because there is nothing in a bureaucratic system to incentivize efficiency. Small it will grow back as soon as you turn around.

Answer 9

It should be smaller,more efficient,and have laws that are more just.

Answer 10

it should be smaller...and run by people who are not corrupt, greedy and wealthy.