English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It seems like we are spending allot of our resources on other countries who dont appreciate any of it while the number of poverty level Americans grows each year.

2007-04-21 07:24:48 · 14 answers · asked by Frankie 4 in Politics & Government Government

14 answers

Ummm......YES!!!!

2007-04-21 07:26:29 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Definitely. Here are 2 examples:

1.) Education - The phrase “illiteracy” applies to more than a simple inability to read or write. There is also “functional illiteracy”, defined as ignorance of the fundamentals of a particular area, or minimizing an expected standard of competence regarding some skill or body of information. Functional illiteracy indicates that a large segment of society has been taught how not to rely on reading as a primary source of information. (“Literacy as a Status Characteristic,” Jeanne Curran and Susan R. Takata, California State University, Dominguez Hills, June 1999). This problem affects crime rates, the U.S. economy and impacts adversely on American youth, as their test scores are typically among the lowest among industrialized nations. The U.S. Department of Education (USDOE) estimates that functional illiteracy affects 24 million Americans. Educator Chester E. Finn, Jr. states, “Just five percent of seventeen-year-old high school students can read well enough to understand and use information found in technical materials, literary essays, and historical documents. Barely six percent of them can solve multi-step math problems and use basic algebra."

2.) Health care - A record-setting 46.6 million Americans were without heath insurance in 2005, up from 45.3 million in 2004, according to a new U.S. Census Bureau report.

2007-04-21 08:24:13 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

We have spent billions and billions on the war. When I think of how that could be used to improve health care and education, it breaks my heart.
I keep hearing about how wonderful the economy is doing under mr. bush but what most don't realize is that there are more living in "extreme poverty" (defined as living below the 2000 poverty level) now, than ever before.

2007-04-21 07:28:11 · answer #3 · answered by katydid 7 · 3 0

even as i do not favor to seem heartless the following, i do not see how the fashion of foreclosure pertains to homeless human beings. the concept is that the outcome of those foreclosure replaced into homelessness. this received't be the case. the reason foreclosure are up is because lots of those who couldn't arise with the money for houses or had undesirable credit were approved via banks searching to apply low expenditures and a booming housing market. the region is: in case you get a house personal loan with a variable fee and expenditures bypass up . . . without notice, you won't be able to arise with the money for your position. even if the money those human beings spent on their month-to-month loan isn't lengthy previous. they don't seem to be jobless. they in basic terms could bypass decrease back into residences. As for homelessness, definite, the U.S. must be doing something to guard those who're both unable to paintings or unemployable. Now, i ought to favor to carry close the position you obtain your records; even if, i have heard and skim similar numbers, so i'm in contract with you that funds needs to be spent to assist those persons. regrettably, there are quite a few issues contained in the way of changing homelessness in u . s . a .. there's a stigma antagonistic to psychological ailment. Many see the homeless as "lazy." human beings are selfish. recommendations to searching houses and jobs for the homeless remains no longer precisely attainable. it truly is a small sampling of the stumbling blocks. also, the homeless are invisible to maximum. in the adventure that they infrequently see the homeless, they do no longer could rigidity about it. Out of sight, out of recommendations. 2 billion per week can make a huge distinction, even if it would not clean up something. even if, it ought to steer on us to a workable answer. EDIT: animator . . . so, then what replaced into the point of putting that contained in the question?

2016-12-04 10:19:54 · answer #4 · answered by nageotte 4 · 0 0

i agree. work is too hard. i'd rather sit at home and wait on my monthly check from hillary

the role of government as everyone with an public school education knows, is to print the money and pass it out so everyone get's an equal share. there is too much emphasis on class.
How is it fair that the rich people's kids get to play thier games on an xbox 360 while my kids are still playing on a playstation 2? Rich people are watching tv on a plasma while i have to suffer with a 25 inch CATHODE RAY tube? IT'S JUST NOT RIGHT!! Hillary will make it FAIR!!

2007-04-21 07:39:12 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

Definitely. While China is forging ahead because their people & their country has become their 1st priority, the US is falling behind. If this keeps up, we'll soon be joining the ranks of a third world country and China will own us.

2007-04-21 13:09:08 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

What the USA needs is another revolution to get rid of our corrupt government.

2007-04-21 09:07:40 · answer #7 · answered by masterplumber75 4 · 0 0

You are absolutely right. I am sick and tired of feeding the world and then drive down the street and an American is homeless and has no food.

2007-04-21 07:30:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Absolutely yes.

There is more democracy in Iraq right now than there is in the USA.

2007-04-21 07:42:57 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Definitely YES. The US currency has gone down so much it's embarassing!

2007-04-21 07:27:21 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 3 0

Yep, that's why we need to get SOMEONE in office that will actually deliver what they say! Hard call!

2007-04-21 07:27:20 · answer #11 · answered by ~Another Day~ 5 · 3 0

fedest.com, questions and answers