I am sick and tired of liberal Democrats saying that Bill Clinton's strategy on Iraq was the right one. It may have been the right one at the time but right now it wouldn't. If we had never gone in 2003 then Saddam would have seen the Iran was developing nuclear power (and possibly weapons) and would have either started up his nuclear project or attacked Iran again and things would be much worse than they are. America is a liberator, always has been and always will be (unless Democrats get their way and make friends with the terrorists). Which would you prefer, war with Iraq only (and possibly Iran later if the need arises) or war with Iraq and Iran at the same time. I have to say 1 at a time. I'm sure that Democrats are going to say that the only way to win is through diplomacy, well the only way to win against terrorists, Islamic extremists and countries like Iran is to beat them into submission.
2007-04-21 06:10:04 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
i agree 100%
2007-04-21 07:19:58 · answer #1 · answered by Jeremy P 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
The problem with idiots is they are all armchair quaterbacks and not one of them is developmental enough to get their lazy butts out of their easy chair and start walking down the path to change. Each and everyone has the power to make change yet they choose to sit back and throw stones at what they don't like, criticize what they don't understand, and attach name calling labels to people that differ in religion, patriotism, and belief. I guess that is only because they are unable to accurately take a stance on who they are or what they are all about because if they had those convictions they would be learning what to do and making the changes in the system they throw stones at. The system is by the people and the people can change it but not one at a time. If the idiots do not like things as they are start the changes. Funny, when some one takes their cahones out of the closet and puts them on and wears them with conviction, there is an uncountable number of people that will follow. Most people are not natural leaders and become armchair quarterbacks on Monday morning with a critique of Friday nights game with amazing accuracy. The leaders are the ones that start Friday nights game with a plan and through the course of the game steer a team into a winning position with logic, skill and guts. Difference is talking the talk and walking the walk.
2007-04-21 17:22:06 · answer #2 · answered by g_menagerie 3 · 0⤊ 1⤋
What percentage of Iranians is under the age of 25? What percentage of Iranians support the actions of the president? Most Iranians are under the age of 25, and most Iranians do NOT like the current president. If you really want to get Iran to change its ways, all you have to do is be patient and let the younger people take over, which they are gradually doing. At a recent presidential rally, students burned pictures of the president in his presence - something extremely daring and dangerous to do with that country's current government. You are confusing the GOVERNMENT of Iran with the PEOPLE of Iran, just like a lot of Europeans are doing when they say all Americans are "arrogant" and "cowboys". If we attacked Iran, then we only serve to enforce what the president of Iran has said about us, and if we don't, then they will know in Iran that he is a liar. Attacking Iran would be a disaster. You need to learn a lot more about the Middle East before you go making statements like this. BTW: Did you know that the USA had a CIA sponsored coup d'etat to install the Shah because they didn't like his predecessor because he was a socialist? The Shah turned out to be a brutal dictator in Iran. THAT is why the USA is NOT liked in Iran. Read a history book about the Middle East, and then come back here. Most muslims are moderates, and those muslims are getting sick and tired of the extremists.
BTW: I'm a moderate.
2007-04-21 13:23:17 · answer #3 · answered by Paul Hxyz 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Sounds like you graduated from the Limbaugh academy. It's the same kind of meaningless, rhetorical nonsense we hear from Rush, Hannity and the rest. It ignores the fact that Saddam wasn't in a position to restart a nuclear program in 2003, Iran is less inclined to give up theirs with a massive US presence in the region, the war was never presented to the American people as a war of liberation and that our relationship with more moderate Muslim governments have been strained at best. Those are the people that we need to be working and negotiating with. I don't know where the right got the asinine idea that the left wants to negotiate with the actual terrorists.
2007-04-21 13:34:05 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
Bill is just another Monday morning quarterback trying to get his wife elected so he can play in style again and no longer have to pay like he does now. Clinton had no clue about Iraq other than it did have WMD which he stated clearly more than once. He did not have the courage to do anything nor did he have a clue. Bill plan was to do absolutely as little as possible. If you do nothing you can be blamed for nothing was his train of thought. So yes, I am tired of idiots that try to make Clinton out to be more than what he actually was which is one big nothing.
2007-04-21 13:16:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 2⤋
I am so sick of idiots. That is why 3 neighbors are missing and 5 family members cannot be accounted for. They were idiots and I hated them so I disposed of them.
This makes as much sense as continually dragging up Bill Clinton concerning the war in Iraq. I am positive he was not the president who said, bring it on and mission accomplished. i am positive he is not the president that refuses to see that there needs to be an end to the war. I am positive he is not the president that his own party is currently turning on like a pack of dogs. Noooo, that moron is your hero, bush.
.
2007-04-21 13:35:22 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 2⤋
I am tired of idiots who rant with bravado here instead of putting their actions where their loud moouth is and getting their fat butts in Iraq to SHOW that courage. But I'm wrong - that's not idiots - that's very smart only sissy, wuss and cowardly, like a true republican.
2007-04-21 13:35:54 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 2⤋
That strategy is right if you don't want to complete the job you started, this way you can leave it for someone else to clean up your mess and your side gets to snipe at then too. Its a win/win!
2007-04-21 13:24:12 · answer #8 · answered by stupidcaucasian 6 · 0⤊ 3⤋
I'm very tired of idiots, but I'll focus on the administration's idiocy and not the idiocy of the question, ample evidence and temptation notwithstanding. It'll get me time off from Purgatory.
2007-04-21 13:15:15 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋
Yes I'm tired of liberalism, thing is, I am a liberal. I love my 400 dollar haircut.
2007-04-21 13:14:12 · answer #10 · answered by ? 2 · 4⤊ 3⤋