cont...free world no boundries no boarders no religions no drugs .rights to choose every man /every women new person.all liblities of raising childrens of govt.no currancy no currruptions every thing free from govt.every industry every business under one govrnmant.every thing for all no americans no australians no indian china nothing only one world one centralise government. food water hospitals jeweleris cloths every thing free use and return it back.working hours for every person.as per there inteligence.homes theaters all free nothing to pay just enjoy. IF THIS WILL HAPPENS WILL WE LIVE HAPPPPYYYLLLYYYY????/
2007-04-21 03:17:21 · 7 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
No. Not all of us will. Maybe we'd accept it, but if there is no risk and not conflict then we can't enjoy peace and prosperity.
2007-04-21 03:23:19 · answer #1 · answered by hallucinatingcandles 4 · 0⤊ 1⤋
It's what John Lennon was alluding to in his song Imagine. I like the idea. Mostly about no borders. Then there would be less reason for people to engage in war. And less reason for there to be division amongst human beings. People are always going to come at you with "that's not possible, how could you do that, how would that work?" but frankly, since it's a utopian concept, the question of "how" is not really relevant is it?
2007-04-21 04:58:36 · answer #2 · answered by LindaLou 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't think so. I recommend reading a book called Anthem by Ayn Rand. It's a short book and hits it on the button, I think.
2007-04-21 03:24:03 · answer #3 · answered by majestic_red 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
sounds like a utopia for me, kind of a upgraded Communism, where the ruler really cares about its people, i little to perfect, lets just hope one day the world be a better place for all of us where there no ethnic differences, since we all are citizens of the world
2007-04-21 04:26:44 · answer #4 · answered by carolyn g 1 · 1⤊ 0⤋
It is Communism. Everything that is done to the extreme will not have a good result in the end.
2007-04-21 03:59:20 · answer #5 · answered by Wednesday 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
no, because people are too different,,,,, not everyone would want the same things,,,,,,, and if government is responsible for children, and i assume other necessities, then you are speaking of a government run society,,,,,, which never would be able to give each person what would make them happy,,,,,
2007-04-21 03:24:32 · answer #6 · answered by dlin333 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
what a nightmare.I wouldnt want to live in that word-its communistic.
2007-04-21 03:25:04 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋