If they did - WHY?
2007-04-21 02:27:16 · 6 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Current Events
I didn't watch the NBC coverage, but Fox, ABC and CBS bleeped out the profanities. And I think I'm like you in believing that the whole video was obscene and it was ridiculous to bleep out the bad language. Like we can handle this totally evil and vicious tirade but not the four-letter words?! The fact that Cho sent his "manifesto" to a news network means that it was always his intention to kill to become famous. We played right into his scheme; we are his accomplices!
It was not in the public interest to air the tape. If it is, then why aren't the networks showing videos of people being blown up in Iraq or terrorists beheading their victims?
2007-04-21 02:59:30 · answer #1 · answered by lesroys 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
nian3555 and waiching liu are the ones reporting everyone for no reason, report them back and point out that people at Yahoo do not have the right to censor us just cos we don't agree or sympathise with them.
2007-04-23 05:04:33 · answer #2 · answered by Hot Coco Puff 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Of course they did it is NBC because younger viewers may be watching also that it may be offensive to some people
2007-04-21 06:00:44 · answer #3 · answered by kooldudekylet 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Yes, because the United States Media think they have the right to censor anything, even an insane, dying man's last manifesto.
2007-04-21 02:34:42 · answer #4 · answered by Starlight 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋
yeah...cusing is not allowed on tv in the news like that
2007-04-21 02:34:50 · answer #5 · answered by patti s 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they did because they are not permitted to show swearing
2007-04-21 02:30:29 · answer #6 · answered by MICHAEL A 1 · 0⤊ 0⤋