English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

16 answers

Sometimes, you have to fight for your rights. It's a big part of human history, not something new that Bush came up with.

2007-04-19 21:36:34 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 5 0

It should be the last alternative and avoided as much as possible. But unfortunately, there are individual governments, gangs, tyrants, and thugs that try to disrupt the harmony of the people of the world.

Sometimes is it just inevitable. You can't turn your back on them and pretend they don't exist. You have to look them directly in the eye and put them in their place.

2007-04-19 22:10:13 · answer #2 · answered by George 3 · 1 0

War is not the proper way to solve disputes because it causes destruction and deaths. Negotiations, blockades and embargoes must be used instead of wars.

2007-04-19 21:35:45 · answer #3 · answered by FRAGINAL, JTM 7 · 2 2

The Report from Iron Mountain - What you are about to read is the secret report of the " Special Study Group " of 15 people brought together during the Kennedy years and now has been declassified . It describes perfectly why and how we live the way we do now . The proposal for the " Special Study Group " as it is known , came around 1961 and was established in August 1963 . Among the people assembled was John Kenneth Galbraith , Robert McNamara , Dean Rusk and McGeorge Bundy . The group was formed to study the implications of a world without war while still being able to maintain the control of the population by having them believe we were at war and filled with the fear of war { read that again to grasp the full understanding }. The contents of this report was revealed by a man who was apart of the group and who felt the public should know what the documents contained . No one knows who this man is , he is only known as " John Doe " . The Report laid out the functions of war which the new policies would have to replace , they are - 1. Economic - War has provided both ancient and modern societies with a dependable system for stabilizing and controlling national economies . No alternative method of control has yet been tested in a complex modern economy that has shown itself remotely comparable in scope or effectiveness . 2. Political - The permanent possibility of war is the foundation for stable governments ; it supplies the basis for general acceptance of political authority . It has enabled societies to maintain necessary class distinctions, and it has ensured the subordination of the citizen to the state by virtue of the residue war powers inherent in the concept of nationhood . No modern political ruling group has successfully controlled its constituency after failing to sustain the continuing credibility of an external threat of war .3. Sociological - War , through the medium of military institutions , has uniquely served societies , throughout the course of known history as an indispensable controller of dangerous ( free thinking ) social dissidence and destructive antisocial tendencies . 4. Ecological - War has been the principle evolutionary device for maintaining a satisfactory ecological balance between gross human population and supplies available for survival . It is unique to the human species . What did they say about population control you ask ? Well here it is -" There is no question that a universal requirement , be procreation limited to the products of artificial insemination which would provide a full control of population levels . Such a reproductive system would of course have the added advantage of being susceptible to a direct eugenic management . Its predictable further development - conception and embryonic growth taking place wholly under laboratory conditions - would extend these controls to their logical conclusion . The ecological function of war under these conditions would not only be superseded but surpassed in effectiveness . The indicated immediate step forward - total control of conception with a variant of ubiquitous " pill " , via water supplies or certain foods , offset by a controlled antidote - is already under development . "Remember this was the 1960's . More then 46 years have passed since then and already the so called " immediate step " was already under development . So it begs the question - What is going on in our food and water ? Take an example from Professor Paul Ehrlich who wrote in his book , entitled - The Population Bomb - published 2 years after this secret report was completed in 1966 . He wrote and I quote - " Governments could enforce birth control by the addition of temporary sterilants to water supplies and/or food . " Yet that quote is labeled as fantasy and mere coincidence that it came out 2 years after the Report from Iron Mountain . Anyway lets move on to what these " experts " said about alternatives to further world wars and what to do when no war is present . It says and I quote -" Unite the population behind their controllers under the threat of war or some other form of destruction and keep them in a permanent state of fear , therefor dependent on there " saviors " . In the light of the need to control the population without war we need an omnipresent , virtually omnipotent international police force ; an established and recognized extraterrestrial menace ; massive global environmental pollution ; fictitious alternate enemies ; a modern , sophisticated form of slavery ; new religions or other mythologies ; and a comprehensive program of applied eugenics . " There you have it - the Report from Iron Mountain . Now you see why it is so important as it seems as though a serial killer or somebody severely mentally ill wrote all this , but no - the U.S. government did .

More on my 360 page.

2007-04-19 21:36:29 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Glory for the American Empire! Long live the 1000 Year Retch!

2007-04-19 21:36:23 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0 3

Religion, greed, power and protecting the interests of the rich people.

2007-04-19 21:51:57 · answer #6 · answered by RainbowGirl 4 · 0 3

because bush jr wanted to finish what daddy started or did most of you people forget about that

2007-04-20 01:02:05 · answer #7 · answered by chris37mtx 3 · 0 1

war, which is organized violence between human clans, will be with us as long as we are primately dominated by emotions and not logic, as long as we "feel" first and "think" second, as long as we are not evolved into caring for others first intead of caring for ourselves first...!

2007-04-19 21:37:14 · answer #8 · answered by Krytox1a 6 · 1 1

Because the americans who think god is on their side and so does everyone else. And since these are basically irrational arguments by all parties then there's no rational way to settle things.

2007-04-19 21:35:27 · answer #9 · answered by bhalpern123 2 · 1 4

Conflicting beliefs that vary from religion to systematic politics.

2007-04-19 21:35:44 · answer #10 · answered by Hieroglyphic Graffitti! 6 · 1 3

fedest.com, questions and answers