2007-04-19 17:47:29 · 5 answers · asked by michael H 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Law & Ethics
http://deseretnews.com/dn/view/0,1249,600120599,00.html
OR
http://www.wnep.com/global/story.asp?s=5670023
2007-04-19 17:50:24 · update #1
I'll say the second one. it defies basic instinct to hit a pregnant woman for **** sake
2007-04-20 00:57:41 · answer #1 · answered by cross 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Hands down the man who beat the woman. Why? Cos he attacked a pregnant woman and was attempting to murder her unborn child, most likely herself as well. Bloakes get into arguments and brawls all the time, especially at pubs and when drinking is involved.
Although, the supporters of the gun-dork in Virginia would use both incidents to attempt to show aggression towards hulk type people, right waiching lui?
2007-04-21 11:07:11 · answer #2 · answered by Hot Coco Puff 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
So you're asking which is worse: a bar fight, or beating up a pregnant woman.... I think I'll go for that latter - only because at a bar there are stools so one can sit and watch
2007-04-19 18:02:05 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
After a cursory glance, I'd say the second one. I have issues about people hitting women, the fact that she was with child compounds those issues.
2007-04-19 18:01:13 · answer #4 · answered by chris 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
both are terribly bad, but i'd go for the second one because to assault a pregnant woman isn't just madness on one's part, but in it is sick and uncalled for. not to mention that the unborn child could be injured too
2007-04-19 20:23:07 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋