2007-04-19
16:34:41
·
7 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Business & Finance
➔ Renting & Real Estate
the property was owned by a family trust with three bene's- two wanting to sell and one wanting to buy the other two out. The trustee did not acknowledge the one's wish, listed the property and accepted another offer. The 1 bene filed a lis pendes to freeze the sale during litigation. The buyers decided not to wait around & cancelled the transaction. Thier deposit was returned and buyer signed a "Mutual Cancellation Agreement". Now the 1 bene has applied for a refi loan to buy the other 2/3 interest and is about to close ecrow.
NOW HERE IS THE PART IN QUESTION: Even though the buyers agent did not pursue for a commission, the trustee and the listing broker are demanding 5% for the cancelled sale and 3.75% for the buy out, even though the listing was cancelled so the buy out could be done. So why does the broker feel he is still owed full commission for a sale that didn't happen, & partial commission for one that he didn't have anything to do with?
2007-04-19
22:26:57 ·
update #1
the property was owned by a family trust with three bene's- two wanting to sell and one wanting to buy the other two out. The trustee did not acknowledge the one's wish, listed the property and accepted another offer. The 1 bene filed a lis pendes to freeze the sale during litigation. The buyers decided not to wait around & cancelled the transaction. Thier deposit was returned and buyer signed a "Mutual Cancellation Agreement". Now the 1 bene has applied for a refi loan to buy the other 2/3 interest and is about to close ecrow.
NOW HERE IS THE PART IN QUESTION: Even though the buyers agent did not pursue for a commission, the trustee and the listing broker are demanding 5% for the cancelled sale and 3.75% for the buy out, even though the listing was cancelled before the buy out could be done. So why does the broker feel he is still owed full commission for a sale that didn't happen, & partial commission for one that he didn't have anything to do with?
2007-04-19
22:32:17 ·
update #2