Do we need a new oath for Bush admin officials to take?

Question

Obviously, they have a history of being very slippery with facts.
Do we need to change the oath they take as more and more are questioned? Tighten things up and give them less "wiggle room"?

Answer 1

they'd just ignore the new one too!!

Answer 2

Why does it make a difference? The don't care how the people feel anyway.
They'd just break that oath too.

The people have made it clear that they want out of Iraq but the Bush administration won't do it. So much for serving the people...

Answer 3

It wouldn't do any good. They ignore their oath to abide by and defend the Constitution. An oathbreaker is an oathbreaker. They have no honor--and another oath won't change that.

Answer 4

Amazing how some people support the idea of pinning our elected officials down to answering sensitive questions about national security in a public forum where our enemies can hear.
The President offers PRIVATE testimony and he's called, "slippery".

You won't be happy until the President has to reveal all our secrets to the enemy, will you?

Answer 5

Its not the people in office, its the people voting for them. We get the elected officials we deserve. people who voted for bush and now have relized the consequenses should have had better foresight

Dems do lie, sex is petty though compared with polorizing the legal system.

Answer 6

Good idea, but they won't remember the oath!

Answer 7

Too late. Where were you when they got elected?

Answer 8

all politicians lie....not just republicans...do you remember "I did not have sexual relations with that woman." "I didn't inhale." Democrats lie too.

Answer 9

No

Answer 10

" i did not have sex with that woman!!!"