why are the democrats so desperate for us to lose the war in Iraq?

Question

other than the ability to kill their fellow Iraqis the terrorist are completely impotent, the only way can possibly lose is to pack up and go home......what's up with the democrats? Why do they always put their lust for power over our effort to crush terrorism? If they would just shut up the terrorist would have given up long ago because they know their only hope is their pals in the democrat party and their push for control at the expense of our nation's future

Answer 1

They're Dems.

do you ask a crocodile why he bit you ,or a scorpion why he stung you? NO you know they hate America and just have to live with that.

Answer 2

Here is a special report for you......

BUSH HAS ALREADY LOST THE "WAR". It was lost before the first U.S. tank crossed the border into Iraq.

He and his cronies were lusting after those precious oilfields so much that they didn't bother to learn anything about the country, the culture or whether the Iraqis wanted to be "liberated". They didn't give a dam. All they wanted was control of the Iraqi oilfields.

Now he has our young kids over there in the middle of a civil war, surrounded by people who don't want them there. More and more of the whackos from all over the world are heading for Iraq to get their chance for martyrdom.

There is no "war" to "win" or "lose". There never was. You cannot have a war with an enemy you cannot identify. Our kids are just trying to stay alive until someone with a lick of sense tells them it is time to come home.

Answer 3

the war in Iraq is sapping the US and not helping any war on terrorism. Most people in the US want the Iraqi people to stand up and make their own country, but the President doesn't hear us. Most of us also want the result of the US being in Iraq to end with some positive result. The 2 main arguements in the US are:

1) we must throw our might into Iraq and win no matter the cost or how long it takes and I grant you that if the majority of the US people could be inspired to take this burden, we would certainly win..but, it could take 10 years and a total of several years worth of the entire US budget to do it...10-15 trillion dollars possibly as well as 10,000 to 20,000 US dead and more than a million Iraqi dead. That is one idea.

2) make it politically known to our friends as well as our enemies that our intention is to leave a stable Iraq as soon as they are able to defend themselves and scare the Iraqi people into stepping up. Granted, the enemy may just wait...but it is not tactically wise to wait in this situation because the longer they wait, the stronger the government of Iraq will become...if it is true that we risk the emboldening our enemies by telling them we will leave in one year...it is also equally possible that they will bide their time if we stay.,...there are no guarantees in either possibility

if we decide up front that we will stay for a decade, it allows our enemies to come together and gather a larger army...If you want WW3, you want us in Iraq...Maybe WW3 is coming either way, but I for one would rather follow a course of seeking peace before war

The only way the Democraticlly controlled Congress can do their job is to call Bush's bluff...if he is so stubborn as to not even attempt to compromise in any way with the rest of our government, the Congress's only recourse is to not give him funds...they want to gie him funds, but with a time table...he will see this after he vetoes the current bill and is faced with either signing the next simialr bill or having no funds for the war at all. threre will be compromise within months, because the Democrats are holding his feet to the fire

Answer 4

Those people you call terrorist we made into terrorist. Nobody was shooting up Iraq before we got ther bud. But you were too busy planning to invade there to realize that. We want to crush terrorism. We just want to do it the right way. Running into a any middle eastern nation guns blazing isnt the way to do it. If you can support any of what you are saying with actual facts. that can be seen. i would listen to you. im not lying. mail me, but im sure that wont happen.

Answer 5

As an outsider I cannot believe the hatred that is directed to anybody in America who shows any common sense and is not a gun toting right wing lunatic. They are dismissed as commies who hate their country so much they want to destroy it.
To me they sound like people who want to save their country from a situation caused by bad policies driven more by greed and stupidity than a real desire to be the world leaders they should be.

Answer 6

What a vapid question.

Dstr raises excellent points. I'm not sure we should begin with 700, we could scale up as time goes on.

However, that does not directly address your question. What I want to know is, would we have won in Iraq had our administration been competent? This administration's utter incompetence has been demonstrated every time one spins around. First, there was 9/11, which they incompentently ignored the evidence of imminence. Then they incompetently invaded a nation without provocation on false pretexts. This invasion was bungled by not guarding military depots (from which insurgents subsequently stole munitions to improvise explosive devices and harass our troops), or other national treasures, or to prevent the breakdown of key infrastructure.

This administration's incompetence with the natural disaster of Hurricane Katrina is merely one more example. Every disaster and debacle has been exacerbated through incompetence, leading most historians around the world to conclude President Bush has been the worst failure in US history.

The only people who think he is doing an adequate job are so blinded by partisan politics he could bite the head off a puppy and swear allegiance to satan without phasing them.

R is no more "Righteous" than D is "Demonic."

Answer 7

definite it truly is glaring for all and sundry who needs to ascertain it, it truly is gloomy we placed political benefit above what's most suitable for our united states. on your techniques those human beings have not been at warfare for 1000's of years, they were very non violent for 1000's of years, ruled via the Ottoman Turks, the common insurgency in straightforward words lasts 5-10 years, even they advance drained of warfare, even as they see an determination. study some historic previous of the topics, somewhat of giving senseless solutions.

Answer 8

We are not desperate for you to loose the war!

We are desperate for justice, Justice for 9/11!

Bush has done everything but get Osoma.

Wake up Genious this isnt about Liberal or conservs' its about justice for 9/11 and Bush has not done his job!

IT IS GOING ON 6 YEARS NOW, DUDE WHERES THE WMD'S AND WERE IS OSOMA?

Answer 9

I think that they are tiered of having our soldiers getting killed over there for no reason. We went over there to find Bin Lodin. Did we find him? No. Instead we get Husain. Now we are supposedly teaching the Iraqis how to run there own country. Personally I think we should bring all the troops home and leave them to there own devices. I am not against war but this one seems to be endless.

Answer 10

It's an "identity" thing--y'see, the Dems want to "win elections" so they must "oppose" the Repubs as much as possible--logic be darned.

It doesn't really matter if they think they are right or wrong, they've built their "identity" to "oppose" and have to stick to it... except for John Kerry, he can change his mind a lot...

John Kerry... the guy who LOST an election to George W. Bush. That's gotta hurt!

Answer 11

grrr.... I accidentally stared your question... you're welcome...

but if you think we're going to come anywhere CLOSE... EVEN IN THE SAME UNIVERSE TO CRUSHING TERRORISM by fighting in Iraq... then you clearly have NO CLUE what you're saying...

and yeah... they really gave up in Afghanistan with no public support didn't they?