English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

It looks like the millions FOX claimed to be dead turned out to be just a few people.

2007-04-19 14:05:09 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Politics

20 answers

Texas is the place to be if you want to see people die!! Murders in 2005 1400 and 8,000+ rapes . This year they have already gotten 12 executions thru compared with only one in Oklahoma and zero everywhere else in the country. Perhaps Bush spent alot of time in the land of carnage and so the value of human life is extremely cheap. 2005 Texas was 8th highest for crime. Man dont mess with Texas.

2007-04-19 14:46:50 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

What does it count.. Bush already lied to the international whilst he went into Iraq to avenge 9/11, using for sure bogus guidance.. there have been by no potential any WMD's, Bush by no potential meant to assist the Iraqi human beings or he does not have bombed the country to bits, and then there grew to become into his lie approximately Saddam importing nukes from Africa.. yet another huge lie.. to not point out the entire bi-terror automobiles he alleged have been recent in Iraq.. that have been later stumbled directly to be British instruments.. so what does it count.. Bush conspired era!! he has been stumbled on needing.. and should be written into the historic past books because of the fact the worst president ever .. alongside with all of his advisory team.. all of them lied at the same time.. they have been all in on it.. and all complicit .. Iraq could be rebuilt using money and aspects owned by potential of Neo-Cons who could all be bankrupted and despatched ot detention center as war criminals .. they might very own adequate wealth between them to rebuild Iraq and pay off the U. S. distant places debt they racked up..

2016-10-12 23:53:02 · answer #2 · answered by garretson 4 · 0 0

When Bush was governer, he approved of more executions
than any other governer in the United States. Make that
all of the executions in every state combined.
Bush & Saddam - looks like it takes one to know one.

2007-04-19 14:13:37 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 3

You are ignorant of how the legal system works. A Governor cannot "approve" death sentences. Sentences are handed down by juries consisting of ordinary people and then handed down by the judge. A Governor can only pardon or commute a sentence already handed down by a JURY.

2007-04-19 14:14:36 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

"Saddam’s goal … is to achieve the lifting of U.N. sanctions while retaining and enhancing Iraq’s weapons of mass destruction programs. We cannot, we must not and we will not let him succeed."—Madeline Albright, 1998.

"(Saddam) will rebuild his arsenal of weapons of mass destruction and some day, some way, I am certain he will use that arsenal again, as he has 10 times since 1983"—National Security Adviser Sandy Berger, Feb 18, 1998.

"Iraq made commitments after the Gulf War to completely dismantle all weapons of mass destruction, and unfortunately, Iraq has not lived up to its agreement."—Barbara Boxer, November 8, 2002.

"The community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now: a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists. If we fail to respond today, Saddam and all those who would follow in his footsteps will be emboldened tomorrow."—Bill Clinton in 1998.


"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including Al Qaeda members, though there is apparently no evidence of his involvement in the terrible events of September 11, 2001. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons. Should he succeed in that endeavor, he could alter the political and security landscape of the Middle East, which as we know all too well affects American security."—Hillary Clinton, October 10, 2002.


"I am absolutely convinced that there are weapons...I saw evidence back in 1998 when we would see the inspectors being barred from gaining entry into a warehouse for three hours with trucks rolling up and then moving those trucks out."—Clinton’s Secretary of Defense William Cohen in April of 2003.

"Iraq is not the only nation in the world to possess weapons of mass destruction, but it is the only nation with a leader who has used them against his own people."—Tom Daschle in 1998.


"Saddam Hussein’s regime represents a grave threat to America and our allies, including our vital ally, Israel. For more than two decades, Saddam Hussein has sought weapons of mass destruction through every available means. We know that he has chemical and biological weapons. He has already used them against his neighbors and his own people, and is trying to build more. We know that he is doing everything he can to build nuclear weapons, and we know that each day he gets closer to achieving that goal."—John Edwards, Oct 10, 2002.
\
"I will be voting to give the president of the United States the authority to use force - if necessary - to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."—John F. Kerry, Oct 2002.

2007-04-19 14:14:01 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

I clearly remember watching Bush, during his first campaign trail, getting excited and almost turned on whenever he spoke about individual cases of people who were put to death in Texas. It wouldn't surprise me one bit if it turn out that he had the correctional facilities film the executions for him so that he could jerk off to them. He is a sick fvck.
....

2007-04-19 14:17:11 · answer #6 · answered by ladykofnyc 3 · 1 2

The governor is not in charge of the Justice Department

2007-04-19 14:08:29 · answer #7 · answered by John 5 · 2 0

I am SHOCKED that you think the CIA would lie for Bush.

Why would they possibly do that? What is possibly to be gained from that?

It is certainly disturbing how many executions he approved, considering he claims to be a Christian. I guess he talks the talk but doesnt walk the walk. Typical.

2007-04-19 14:09:30 · answer #8 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 3 3

Well if what you say is true, I guess all the dems that said Saddam had murdered thousands and was a threat to the world all lied to us.

2007-04-19 14:13:26 · answer #9 · answered by sociald 7 · 3 2

Oh, yeah. Bush was ready to have everyone in Texas executed. Haven't you heard? Oh, yeah. And he's after you, too. What's your neck size?

2007-04-19 14:13:06 · answer #10 · answered by goaltender 4 · 5 1

fedest.com, questions and answers