2007-04-19 13:28:23 · 18 answers · asked by jean 7 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Clinton hands down.
2007-04-19 13:54:41 · update #1
"You're free. And freedom is beautiful. And, you know, it'll take time to restore chaos and order—order out of chaos. But we will."—Washington, D.C., April 13, 2003
We need an energy bill that encourages consumption
If you don't have any ambitions, the minimum-wage job isn't going to get you to where you want to get, for example. In other words, what is your ambitions? And oh, by the way, if that is your ambition, here's what it's going to take to achieve it."—Speech to students in Little Rock, Ark., Aug. 29, 2002 (Thanks to George Dupper.)
"See, we love—we love freedom. That's what they didn't understand. They hate things; we love things. They act out of hatred; we don't seek revenge, we seek justice out of love."—Oklahoma City, Aug. 29, 2002
Ok how bout... bush vs monkey
no? too tuff.
bush vs Gerbel?
no, Gerbel by a mile.
bush vs Ameba? ....Yeah, that would be fair.
2007-04-19 13:42:56 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 0⤋
Bill Clinton. George Bush is no match for Bill.
2007-04-19 20:34:07 · answer #2 · answered by That one 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Clinton would win. He'd also not directly answer questions. His replies would be vague and more or less wide open without many narrowed down thoughts or perceptions.
Bush on the other hand would sound awkward when actually giving an answer on things he stands for. His replies would be direct, already thought out and deliberate.
As a result he'd be made a mockery of because his answers don't jive with people uneducated enough to understand the depth he put towards considering a solution.
2007-04-19 20:42:57 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 2⤋
You must be kidding, right? Clinton would get out 300 words before Bush got out his first uhhhh. Clinton sure is slick and a great talker even though most of what he says is pure bulls**t. Bush is too dumb to make a point against slick Bill.
2007-04-19 20:33:27 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
Your kidding right?
Of course Bill Clinton would win. Bush is a joke at public speaking and debating, he can't remember anything. He needs an ear piece to tell him what to say at all times. His handlers would never let him debate Clinton. Bill Clinton would wipe the floor with him. Although I think my 3 year old niece would do the same.
2007-04-19 20:32:58 · answer #5 · answered by Stephanie is awesome!! 7 · 4⤊ 3⤋
Bill Clinton. He's a smooth talker. George Bush definitely isn't. The winners of debates are those who usually say things better - not necessarily say better things.
2007-04-19 20:32:04 · answer #6 · answered by Salvage1234 2 · 2⤊ 2⤋
They have already had debates. 3 of them at least remember. If i remember right the first one was deemed close I think that was the townhall style debate, then the second one was quite a bit in Bills favor then the fireside style one was in Bush's favor.
2007-04-19 20:33:39 · answer #7 · answered by sociald 7 · 0⤊ 1⤋
George could only win in two debate questions. Who could snort the most coke and who is a better cheerleader himself or the Dallas Cowboy Cheerleaders.
2007-04-19 20:33:50 · answer #8 · answered by LuckyD 3 · 3⤊ 1⤋
George
2007-04-19 20:31:14 · answer #9 · answered by impalersca 4 · 2⤊ 4⤋
I'd have to say Clinton
2007-04-19 20:36:35 · answer #10 · answered by pstiffyinc 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋