English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I just watched CNN with Wolf Blizer (at 7:00 pm ET). Wolf (host) asked Dr. Helen Morrison, a self-claimed forensic psychiatrist, “Could school bullying turn Cho into such a mass killer?”

“No. Absolute not! School bullying cannot turn Cho into a mass killer.”
Wow! That is indeed a new analysis. I was really amazed by her assertiveness when she was saying it. So, school bullies, you can all go on with your bullying. American Dr. Helen Morrison just gave you a certification/ green light to keep bullying the week.

2007-04-19 13:23:47 · 20 answers · asked by Truth-for-all 2 in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

20 answers

Another good way to stop mass murdering would be to stop providing people with the tools to do that killing - GUNS! how can you sell hand guns to anyone and everyone who is able to tick a box saying they are not crazy and expect anything else?!?!?! Jeez you Americans really are dumb.

2007-04-19 13:28:39 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 2

Your last two sentences are way off base. Bullying is an ongoing problem that needs to be addressed. However, bullies cannot take away our sense of right and wrong. Millions of kids are bullied and teased, but a vast majority of them grow up to become productive members of society.

Fact: you will never hear a story on CNN, or on any other news network about someone being bullied in school, and growing up to be a respected doctor or business leader. You only hear about the very small handful of people who flip out and shoot people. Most of the time, the people who do it have some kind of mental illness to begin with.

2007-04-19 13:41:36 · answer #2 · answered by lj1 7 · 0 0

Don't beleive what you see on the news channels. Their main purpose is to make money and one way of doing that is by making dramatic sensationalised statements. Even if it turned out he had been a victim of bullying or there was some reason that pushed him into the horrible slaughter, the press wouldn't report it because it would go against the public feeling. No they want to make him look as bad as possible and even if he had been bullied it wouldn't come out. I'm not saying that it is a justifiable reason for doing what he did, but it could show why he carried such resentment to the 'Rich kids'.

2007-04-19 14:10:57 · answer #3 · answered by Asherz 3 · 1 1

What does U.N.C.L.E. stand for? Originally, nothing. But the creators/writers were pressed to come up with something. The result of their efforts: The United Network Command for Law and Enforcement. By the time the first episode aired on 22-September-64, this appeared in the end titles: "We wish to thank the United Network Command for Law and Enforcement without whose assistance this program would not be possible.'' What does Thrush stand for? In the series, the organization was merely called Thrush. Ace paperbacks, which published a series of paperback novels based on the show, had one installment in which Thrush stood for The Technological Hierarchy for the Subjugation of Humanity and the Removal of Undesirables. This is very popular with long-time fans of the shows, who have adopted it as "canon" or at least near-canon.

2016-05-19 01:55:08 · answer #4 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

I agree with you. And disagree with her. Cruelty of childrens bulling other children can transform in that kind of "sleeping" aggression that's for sure. Because for the young "soft" child's mind bulling is first the most horrible thing that happens to them, and if from that child won't develop a strong personality to deal with those memories in the future - it will occupy the mind of already grown up person making him if not a serial killer than a wife-beater or a child-abuser. Bulling is the great and very dangerous problem which very easily can become a time-bomb inside of any "healthy" mind.

2007-04-19 14:09:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

If every student that was a victim of a school bully went on a shoting spree, the USA population would be about 10 million. These bullies are everywhere, just a part of growing up. Not a valid excuse.

2007-04-19 13:29:13 · answer #6 · answered by porcerelllisman q 4 · 2 1

Careful. He alluded to abuse at home, sexual abuse, rejection by rich females he stalked, and general hatred for the rich. Her point, taken out of context by you, is that bullying in and of itself was not the culprit.

Ultimately, it was not Cho's environment that caused him to do what he did. If people really start believing this, then we will see many more doing horrible things and justifying them.

Cho chose to do what he did. He is responsible, not even those who might have molested him!

2007-04-19 13:43:30 · answer #7 · answered by realchurchhistorian 4 · 1 0

I was bullied. I am now a Master of Business Administration. (My bully is now a janitor with a high school diploma).

Clean your ears out. Cho was a bully himself.

2007-04-19 13:33:49 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

shes wrong bullying can lead to those things and Cho had a mental illness

2007-04-19 13:27:46 · answer #9 · answered by P.I.M.P. man 2 · 1 0

considering where this kid came from, south korea a war torn country bombarded by war & stress then come to america go to college get harrassed by rich spoiled people with no consideration or manners much less humanity for the less fortunate. they are ones to be blamed for this.

2007-04-19 13:54:09 · answer #10 · answered by audrey_halley2004 4 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers