Harry says: "I believe ... that this war is lost, and this surge is not accomplishing anything, as is shown by the extreme violence in Iraq this week...."
2007-04-19 12:13:43 · 11 answers · asked by Delray 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Here's a link: http://www.breitbart.com/article.php?id=070419174958.d2ni8f1d&show_article=1
2007-04-19 12:14:38 · update #1
Old Dude:
Harry Reid is a dirty, money-grubbing politician, as evidenced by the excess profits he made on his recent "land deal." It's Harry who isn't worthy to carry the taxpayer's "lunchbox."
Harry is an even greater disgrace, not for his opinion, but for his politicization of the issue and for the disgraceful way that he expressed that opinion. He could have said what he had to say in a more meaningful and constructive way. But then, Harry's never been accused of being a statesman, has he? I wouldn't allow him to scrub my toilets, muchless carry my lunchbox. May he rot for the effects his comments have on the troops. At any rate, none of them will forget Democrats' words.
2007-04-19 14:34:39 · update #2
The sad thing is he cares nothing about the credibility he gives to killing and death among those who oppose us in Iraq. They see this (and they do) and know they merely need to ratchet up the violence a few more weeks until America folds. Harry Reid is the loser.
2007-04-19 12:17:04 · answer #1 · answered by netjr 6 · 4⤊ 0⤋
That quote is a reasonable conclusion based on the facts, however it seem most of the comments submitted in criticism believe that illegally occupying this country indefinitely is a great plan. We entered without just cause, without a plan after attacking and subduing a military that was not even contemplating an attack on us or from us. There is not a declaration of war against this country because they did nothing to us. In the mean time the 911 perps that staged from Afghanistan are still at large and the war that should have been completed in Afghanistan is still dragging on as well.
These conflicts have dragged on longer than all of WWII and there is no plan to bring it to a successful conclusion. Cheap character assassination remarks about Senator Reid come from informed individuals that couldn't even carry his lunch box. Get a life.
2007-04-19 13:23:11 · answer #2 · answered by Old dude 1 · 0⤊ 2⤋
Throw those polls out. It potential no longer something in February even as the election is in November. even with the actual undeniable actuality that, i desire Reid loses, issues can turn in his favor. The warfare in Afghanistan is going in our favor, the business device would receive a burst because the spring climate strikes in and extra human beings get paintings on stimulus initiatives, and something of the stimulus receives spent for warding off foreclosure. So, if all this improves the region contained in the country, human beings would settle on no longer to tip the apple cart. My own opinion is that Reid has been a challenge for Obama and congress. He needs to get replaced. His loss ought to end the gridlock it truly is paralyzing this united states.
2016-12-04 08:10:56 · answer #3 · answered by bulgarella 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Reid is a hippie who happens to wears a suit.
Today's generation of Americans has been brainwashed to believe that America is evil. Liberals are too dumb to realize that they are aiding our enemy. Our enemies don't have to beat us because Liberal Democrats will beat us. They are the enemy within. Liberals want us to lose this war. Nothing will make them happier.
2007-04-20 12:19:34 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
You have problems with the truth? We're caught between Iraq and a hard place, a civil war. The surge is a bust thus far and the future isn't bright.
You can dispute this?
2007-04-19 12:19:22 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
He's an embarassment, it amazes me he was elected, but then again I'm amazed that Pelosi, Feinstein, Boxer, Kennedy, Kerry, Dean, Murtha were elected too!
2007-04-19 12:25:59 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
why? because he's telling the truth?
he's not a disgrace....because the war was lost when we first went there, there was no way we could or can win....we're waging a war against an idea, you can't beat an idea with violence...and the surge ISN'T accomplishing anything, the violence has gone way up since we started it...
2007-04-19 12:24:22 · answer #7 · answered by Paulien 5 · 1⤊ 3⤋
Not only is he a disgrace, he is also a defeatist. Who the hell would want someone like that representing them? Not very leadership like is he?
2007-04-19 12:17:43 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 0⤋
How big a fool for disagreeing with him?
2007-04-19 12:17:26 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 3⤋
hopefully he won't be around much longer
2007-04-19 12:16:44 · answer #10 · answered by kapute2 5 · 4⤊ 0⤋