What do you think of gun control?

Question

I think it is a double edged sword. You can't ban all guns and you can't hand them out to every single person. It's complicated and there is a benifit and consequence to each. But what do you think of the gun control laws.

People say give guns to law abiding citizens, but you aren't born a criminal. You have to BECOME one. Each person that obtains a gun could possibly be on the verge of commiting a crime.

Answer 1

I currently carry a concealed carry permit. In order to be able to do so, I have never been convicted of a felony (lifetime), never been convicted of any drug offense, i have no mental disablities or defects, and have passed a criminal background check. I have gone through 80 hours of both certifications and qualifications for firearms.

Do I think EVERYONE should be able to possess a gun? No, I don't, however the 2nd Amendment to our constitution allows for the private citizen to arm himself. I believe that with proper training and certifications everyone who WANTS to carry a firearm should be allowed to have one.

Each state has different laws, and in the case of this week's shootings, I am proud to say that Mr. Cho would not been allowed to purchase these guns in the state of Ohio. Virginia needs to re-think their gun laws and enact a bill that tightens the standards for the buying and selling of handguns.

Answer 2

I have already posted this exact response, but am pasting it into all gun-control questions because as opposed to ranting and raving, for one side or the other, you will find that my data is at least highly accurate if you decide to research it (do not complain if you get data from unreliable sources; mine are from a collaboration of OFFICIAL crime data sets, such as the Unified Crime Report [UCR]).

Guns are not the issue but, instead, the problem lies with the ability for people to use them improperly to assert control over other people. The only thing which could be accomplished by outlawing guns altogether would be to take them away from law abiding people. The criminals would still have them... think about it: if they're already engaged in criminal behavior which causes them to believe that they need guns, then they will not hesitate to break the law in order to acquire firearms; they are already breaking the law, anyway. Now, this idea may seem a little outlandish to many people, but.... If you consider that true career criminals constitute only 6% of the total population then, if everyone was issued a handgun and trained to use it properly, you might see that 6% begin to disappear for fear of being confronted by the other 94% of the armed, law abiding population. In effect, proper distribution of firearms could actually cause a decrease in crime trends.

Answer 3

it is the non-public thought of mine that gun administration would not and could no longer each and every artwork. Now, even though the gun ban information you have is very interesting it does no longer propose it is genuine. i'm spending alot of my time to verify all which you stated to extra my argument that gun administration would not artwork. What i'm able to assert that a sufferer that fires decrease back LIVES LONGER. this is the reality while you evaluate that guy or woman ahas some thing to safeguard themeselves with. If the folk in each and all the international places listed have been to have had weapons and the government nonetheless tried to kill them they might ahve been met with armed resistance and a there would eb a lots smaller physique count selection. I dont choose to project faraway from subject count yet while the colonists fought for the liberty of the colonies to furnish us united states of america of america there became the Minutemen (protection rigidity) and the defense force. The protection rigidity became very very nearly completely armed with Kentucky long Rifles on an identical time as the defense force became armed with comfortable bore muskets. The long rifle became rifled which made the bullet bypass straiter and it went farther. while our forefathers wrote the bill of Rights it became their purpose to make confident that that often stayed the comparable that the US electorate had equivalent footing with that of a central authority controled miltiary incase the US government became corrupt the electorate would desire to combat decrease back.

Answer 4

If it will be illegal to own gun, there will be a large black market, just like drugs, etc.

If one really wants to get his hands on the gun, he will get it. Gun control will not stop crime. It will take guns away from people who need guns to protect themselves

Answer 5

If every kid in that school carried around a firearm and was trained how to use it. That crazy kid would have not had such an easy time and more people would probably be alive. More guns not gun control.

Answer 6

Law abiding citizens obey the gun laws we have now criminals do not.
Making it more difficult for people to purchase firearms will not make it more difficult for criminals to get them.
When guns are outlawed ony outlaws will have guns.

Answer 7

Stricter gun control laws won't really help.

Most shootings/murders are used with illegally obtained weapons.

Answer 8

If an intruder is knocking down your door, you would want the best gun you could get.

The best police response time is 3 1/2 minutes.

We need to protect ourselves.

Answer 9

I think it is fine as is. Cho would have killed with or without a gun.

Answer 10

I control mine just fine thanks...gun control is hitting your target!