English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Thats right, hes NOT. All you BULLYS are.

(This is my answer to a previous question I answered)

There wouldnt be these "sick freaks of nature" if people would just ACCEPT PEOPLE FOR WHO THEY ARE. And reach out to a fellow student who is in need, instead of sweeping the problem under the carpet and hoping it will go away.

If someone would have reached out to Cho MORE than oncem then maybe this would not have happened.

If you ask me, we need to get rid of all the bullys in this world. But something tells me, there will NEVER be total accpetance of others. There will always be ignorant people.

Get rid of the bullys and people like Cho would be happier.

What do you think?

2007-04-19 10:08:34 · 28 answers · asked by Anonymous in Society & Culture Other - Society & Culture

The help he was given was passed OFF. It should have been more persistent.

2007-04-19 10:20:16 · update #1

Who says it was RIGHT of him to kill?? NO ONE. Just like is wasnt RIGHT of anyone to bully him!

2007-04-19 10:27:43 · update #2

28 answers

i think ur crazy... not a bad guy??? the people he killed WERENT the ppl making fun of him!!! he didnt target his bullys he targeted INNOCENT PEOPLE YOU IDIOT!!! YEAH HE IS A BAD GUY ANYONE THAT KILLS INNOCENT PEOPLE AND BY STANDERS IS A BAD GUY... DUH!!

2007-04-19 10:42:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

So far there is no real evidence that Cho was bullied.

Yes bullies do cause a lot of problems for people and there are children who cause harm as a result.

However there is Lots of evidence that Cho was mentally disturbed. YEARS of evidence.

He had stalked female students at the school. He had caused other people problems. One professor kicked him out of class because of Cho's behavior.

It's such a sad thing that happened both for Cho AND for the students killed.

But don't blame this terrible thing on bullies. It just was not the case. It was Cho's own mental illness. People had tried over a period of years to get Cho to get help but he refussed. Because of the way our mental health system is set up adults can not be forced to be committed. They can be held in most places for about 48 hours for observation. Which happened to Cho. Cho chose NOT to go into therapy. In the US the mental health system can not legally force an adult to have mental health therapy. That's just fact. He was not passed off. He Refused It!

If you want to place blame for Cho's ramage, Blame the US Mental Health System!

2007-04-19 10:51:41 · answer #2 · answered by ♥♥The Queen Has Spoken♥♥ 7 · 2 1

Really getting rid of bullying is harder then getting rid of terrorism. Only because everyone is a bully in some form or another. You can't tell me in the how ever many years you've been on this earth you have yet to talk **** about someone, or talk behind their back or to their face. Everyone is guilty of bullying, but its not so much that people didn't lend a helping hand to him if he had only asked I bet there would of been alot of people there for him, the first step to all problems is admitting it to other people and yourself. He didn't see a problem in his thinking so he fed off himself until it got out of control. I'm sure bullying probably had something to do with it slightly but he did all this to himself, he could of stood up for himself if only he had little more respect for himself. Only problem with kids that get bullied is because they don't stick up for themselves when they need to, they just accept it and let it build in their mind. Once you confront a bully hes nothing, so don't blame other people it was all his fault he could of got friends if he tryed.

2007-04-19 10:17:40 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

I guess I could agree to a certain extent, but granted I have seen my fair share of kids from high school who were picked on and were not with the popular crowd who are now more successful than I ever would be. Why didn't they grab a Glock and start letting off on the school Cafeteria? I know I'm in no place to judge Cho Seung Hui but there are plenty of people who have been picked on and taunted more than he experienced.

2007-04-19 10:11:37 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 2 0

Yes and no.
He was equally a victim of mental illness as were the others who died in the attack. But "getting rid of bullies" is not the solution -- that is more of the same, of singling out people to blame, instead of identifying problems we all share. I agree to get rid of "bullying behavior" but this takes all of us to quit it.

What made Cho sick was not his autism in itself, which compounded the problem, but his inability to forgive. His autistic and social traits cut him off from people who may have been able to help him, so he became alienated, lost and trapped. Unforgiveness and resentment has been shown to block the flow of natural healing energy in the body, resulting in cancer both spiritually and physically. In severe cases, people can become demonically addicted or infested with multiple personalities or voices. These conditions can be detected, treated and cured; or can go untreated until they become deadly beyond help.

So the point is to catch it early, and never to let hurt or anger go unaddressed or repressed where it causes sickness in any form. I agree with you that Cho was not the cause itself, as he was sick with rage and needed special attention for his multiple conditions before it got to the point of losing control. But the process of removing the bullying divisive attitude means not spreading any more blame or defensiveness, but sharing equal responsibility for the situation and working together to correct and prevent recurrence. I think that is the reason this happened -- to compel us all to drop our differences and work together without barriers or boundaries that have stopped us in the past.

2007-04-19 10:25:37 · answer #5 · answered by Nghiem E 4 · 2 0

Ok, we get rid of the bullies and then what?

People find another excuse like blaming their upbringing, blaming skintone and the fact that certains races had it hard in the past. I mean we can blame EVERYONE we can, but it doesnt mean we should make any excuses for a few windfalls/downfalls someone endures in their past.

The world is a cold cold place, either you learn to adapt or take seperate actions; as what Cho did.

I was bullied before, but you get up, grow up and MOVE ON!!!

He was obviously a disturbed being..

Go and see my questions relevant to this issue...

Thanks!!!

2007-04-19 10:16:31 · answer #6 · answered by Simply Kai 4 · 3 1

Am thinking you are very young look back on this in a few years and you will feel very differently being nice to people who are mentally ill does not fix them they will just find other reasons to behave negatively he was just not wired right more than likely this could not have been prevented well maybe after the first shooting... no am not even going to get started on that.

2007-04-19 10:23:31 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

He did not need to do what he did, just because he may have been bullied doesn't give him the right to go a killing spree. He had more than one opportunity to seek help, yet he resorted to violence. Would you be blaming people that may have taunted him if he was aiming his gun at you? There is a saying; "two wrongs don't make a right." If he shot one of your friends would you still say he wasn't "a bad guy"? He was jerk and he did the wrong thing.

2007-04-19 10:19:00 · answer #8 · answered by cireengineering 6 · 2 1

you're joking top? Did you spot the full tale? you may desire to no longer have because of the fact in case you had then you definately might have seen that many situations instructors tried to get him help. He wasn't bullied! He grew to become into an grownup for God's sake. whether he grew to become into teased he might desire to have been appearing like an grownup and reported it quite than KILLING human beings! i grew to become into bullied as a newborn yet by using God i did no longer pass and kill anybody for him. it is what's the topic with society. we expect of that the guy committing the crime is the real sufferer. Oh too undesirable that 32 human beings have been killed by using him adverse little infant grew to become into picked on! huge deal anybody is bullied at one time or yet another of their lives that doesn't supply us permission to kill human beings. He BRAGGED approximately what he did throughout the time of the two hour span between KILLING human beings. How dare you mean that HE grew to become into the sufferer? it incredibly is ill and extremely ignorant. huge deal, my son has been bullied in college yet he's better than that...curiously you're actually not. My son is 8 an already has extra grace and intelligence and correctly worth of humanity than you do. it incredibly is very unhappy for you...

2016-12-29 10:53:13 · answer #9 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

OK, first of all... i do understand where your coming from. There are so many kids that get mistreated in my school and i feel bad for them. But, the people that mistreated him aren't responsible for what HE did.... i mean guns don't kill people, people kill people. If he had a problem the teachers or maybe his parents should have helped him.. It's not the students fault.

2007-04-25 15:11:15 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I do agree. He was bullied terribly in school. He was pushed down, called awful names, and so he withdrew. When his teacher forced him to read aloud in middle school, the entire class started laughing. Yes, much could have been done before he became a bright but demented young man. The Columbine killers had the same problem. Since Columbine, bully awareness has been a big focus in public schools, and now hate crimes are not easily forgiven by the courts. So, inch by inch, we're getting there.

2007-04-19 10:16:20 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3 1

fedest.com, questions and answers