How is pro-choice not pro murder?

Question

Survivability outside the womb? Who, without their mother or other, would not survive outside the womb?

Ever seen a preemie? They wouldn't survive outside the womb without some help.

Answer 1

Abortion is murder. Science has proven this. The media has covered this up.

The mother's DNA is different from that of the fetus. Every cell in the mother's body has a complete copy of her DNA. The fetus does not have a single cell with the mother's DNA.

Additionally, the fetus has brain and cardiovascular function independent of the mother. This science is indisputable, but the left has never been particularly inclined towards deductive reasoning.

Answer 2

My first response to your question dealth with the top line question...the difference between pro-choice and pro murder. The notion of pro choice is in support of a woman's choice to decide what happens to her body...rather than being legally forced to become an incubator.

Your comment about the survival outside of the womb is a valid one. And as a pro-choice individual, my argument has always been that I support a woman's rights over the rights of an unformed fetus that cannot support itself outside of the womb...even with artificial means. This would mean very early stage fetuses. And the ruling yesterday was welcomed by myself and like minded individuals...because we do NOT believe in the killings of babies...as we are so often labelled. A woman must make her decision before the fetus can support itself outside the womb...not in the second or third trimester.

Answer 3

Being pro-choice is not being pro-abortion. I am against abortion. And my daughter is a preemie born 4 months early at one pound and took 5 months in the hospital before coming home.I thank God for her. But I give others the choice to make that decision for themselves. What right do I have to live in Florida and tell a woman in Alaska that I never saw in my life and don't know her circumstances ---what she can and can't do to her own flesh and blood and her child's flesh and blood. If she doesn't have a viable reason for having an abortion like, rape, AIDS, or the risk of losing her own life through child birth.....then God and that woman will deal with her punishment. Not you or I.

Answer 4

I don't understand your question. It seems you start out bashing pro choice but then make the argument for us. Some preemie's do not survive outside the womb and some only do so with intensive medical intervention.

I don't see pro-choice as a pro-murder.

Answer 5

at the moment of conception there is one cell. A single cell can not host a soul for there is no brain in which to reside. 9 months later there is a fully developed brain with a unique presence, a soul. Somewhere between day one and day 280 there is a point of change. Courts should not decide that moment the medical profession should define the beginning of life. Since death is the absence of brainwave activity, should not the beginning be when a unique brainwave pattern emerges?
Anyway, destroying a single cell isn't murder, destroying a newborn is. defining the moment of transition should be what changes, removal of parasitic tissue to ending of a life.

Answer 6

I think something some people don't think about is older women who already have several children. When you are older (45ish) you often think you couldn't get pregnant but then if you do it is probably not the best thing (I'm sure some women are very happy!) because the chances of problems (down syndrome) your baby will have and the financial planning is all messed up. I'm fine with the ban on partial-birth abortions, but I don't want to see all abortions (or especially the day after pill) being banned because it isn't that simple.

Answer 7

Abortion and capital punishment are 2 somewhat some issues and would't somewhat be in comparison the style you cutting-edge them. The crux of all of it is, the toddler in an abortion isn't presented the prospect to verify it very own destiny, regardless of if it would desire to, the place as a offender knows finished nicely the penalty for committing the crime till now he/she commits it.

Answer 8

Marketing, Pro-choice people could choose between many available titles:

Pro-fetus killing
Pro- choosing to kill a baby
Pro- if im not certain he will be a happy human then i will kill him
Pro-protect my future kill a baby
Pro-future citizen killing

Pro-choice sounds the best

Answer 9

Right. The only reason it isn't considered murder is because the laws on the books do not list it as such. It is murder otherwise.

Answer 10

Because when I say I am pro-choice, I am not advocating abortion, I am advocating the notion that whether someone chooses to have an abortion or not is not my (or the government's) business.

And it's none of yours, either.

You'll earn credibility as a "pro-lifer" when you make a stand against the death penalty. Until then, your selective value of human life impresses no one.