http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cannabal
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Incest
2007-04-19 07:36:18 · 17 answers · asked by Anonymous in Arts & Humanities ➔ Philosophy
Both have been used, at one point in time, in one form or another, to carry on our species. So they are both great!!
2007-04-19 13:39:14 · answer #1 · answered by nunya b 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Cannibalism. It contradicts the idea that the human race should be a loving compassionate community. We wouldn't be here if it were not for incest. It is a natural function that humans perform, except for a more grotesque purpose.
2007-04-19 11:21:43 · answer #2 · answered by sunflowerdaisy94 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
From the victim's point of view, it would have to be cannibalism is worse. The victim is dead and eaten, therefore no hope for recovery. An incest victim can get psychiatric help and learn to overcome his/her molestation. But once one is dead, there is no hope in this world.
From the perpetrator's point of view, again cannibalism is worse. For one is participating in an act where step one is committing murder. I view murder as the worst. But that is just my opinion, I could be wrong (sorry DM).
2007-04-19 08:23:59 · answer #3 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋
Depends on whether you are the victim or perpetrator. Both are social anomalies but I would imagine incest might appear to be a far greater one than cannibalism.
2007-04-19 09:07:41 · answer #4 · answered by boston857 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Incest is worse. It's a betrayal of a basic human trust & harms children & damages them for life. Cannibalism is just another source of food in tough times, part of a cultural practice, or for religious purposes way back when...meat is dead. If you're starving, eat it, but please pass the A-1, I like mine medium-well!
2007-04-19 09:45:27 · answer #5 · answered by napqueen 6 · 0⤊ 1⤋
son, incest is worse. for cannibal, our early ancestors did that before, which isn't al that bad because i heard that human tastes like pork.
incest is worse because it's kind of like, close family member having sexual relationship with each other, often known as taboo.
2007-04-19 09:11:33 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I would say incest. There is no logical reason for it.
Cannibalism is based on the human need to survive... to eat and nourish the body.
2007-04-19 08:48:06 · answer #7 · answered by Alexis J 2 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Incest. If you are cannibalized, you have been eaten. if you have experienced incest, you live with it. big big big difference. If I could choose... I'd rather be eaten to be honest.
2007-04-19 07:57:48 · answer #8 · answered by freebird31wizard 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Incest. You still have to live with it.
2007-04-19 07:54:02 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Call me wacky, but I don't find either of them to be bad as long as they're consentual. If you're talking about killing and molesting people, though, that's a whole other ball of wax.
2007-04-19 07:57:01 · answer #10 · answered by Doctor Why 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋