Is it time to combine Homeland Security with Health and Human Services?

Question

Faced with the realization that there are people in society with radically different views than my own, maybe an expanded Health and Human Services Department combined with the Department of Homeland Security could have prevented the tragedy.

I know i'm gonna take a lot of heat on this question, but you gotta be willing to face all possibilities, thats why I asked the question.

Answer 1

Homeland Security is an inefficient, bureaucratic nightmare that has produced little, if any, decent results. In fact the greatest thing it has produced is fear.

Trying to roll it and Health and Human Services into one agency would create an unholy nightmare.

Answer 2

Homeland Security was a creation of the Bush administration to get around Civil Service and Federal employee unions. The hiring and firing in DHS, bypasses the traditional Civil Service process, enabling politicizing and favoritism. Enough (actually too many) of the functions of the Federal government have already been placed under Homeland Security.
Homeland Security has different priorities than Health and Human Services and their goals would become subservient to national security. Look at how FEMA became unable to deliver services after becoming part of Homeland Security.

Answer 3

I think integration between all governmental agencies is necessary on some scale. Certainly, if a person had been determined a threat, they should have been reported to local officials (be it University or police), as well as a potential danger to society.

I don't think complete integration is necessary, but establishing processes and procedures to link agencies that have similar interests can be beneficial. It would be a slippery slope to determine how to keep it from becoming too all-consuming and powerful over the lives of Americans, I can imagine.

For example, if there was better organizational communication between the CIA and FBI, perhaps certain disasters or plots could be avoided.

Answer 4

Are you suggesting the Department for Homeland Security might be do the same thing for Human Services as it has for FEMA?

I don't see much promise.

Answer 5

The motivating factors of the wrongdoer could desire to be seen, besides as organizational affiliations, political/social/non secular agendas before pondering whether or not it develop into an act of terrorism. Terrorism is only the tactic(s) employed by people who're attempting to enforce some form of substitute in coverage, ideals, understanding, and so on., precise or incorrect. The aims, strategies and motivations are what distinguish a terrorist from ethical activist, militaries and political approaches. All warning signs are that this develop into one disturbed individual performing on my own, pushed by a demented very own time table with out genuine plan to enforce substitute. His strategies have been to terrorize those right now impacted by his strikes. long term sorrow and grieving are the effect. purely different sick persons, on my own as replica-cat assaults could act upon Cho's derainged manifesto. enable's not confuse the mentally sick people who choose help with terrorist. Crying "wolf" could desire to heavily forestall the concentration required to attempt against and stop genuine terrorist activities by those the likes of jihadists/fundamantalist/and so on.

Answer 6

No, but look out! Here it comes anyway.
http://www.sierratimes.com/05/05/16/24_209_102_203_25370.htm

The real tragedy will be when we no longer have the right to choose what we or our children put in our bodies. All the thinking and deciding will be done for you. I am talking about mass forced medicating, not illegal drugs.

Answer 7

No, if i don't agree with you that doesn't make me radical in anyway. You can't justify having somebody profiled because they thank differently. That to me is racism in itself.

Answer 8

Sounds scarry!

Answer 9

GOVERNMENT IS NOT THE ANSWER!


It is the Problem!

WAKE UP AMERICA!