The EU just made it ILLEGAL to SPEAK about certain things. They are wanting to create the North American Union in the same light! I don't CARE WHAT the EU laws involve, what I care about is what it will do to the USA as a NATION!
http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20070419/ap_on_re_eu/eu_racism;_ylt=Ao9y7gHQv_E6t1Lpq9UAOZCs0NUE
2007-04-19 06:40:12 · 11 answers · asked by hera 4 in Politics & Government ➔ Government
studbolt, we are not talking about a game here. We are talking about the future of the CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA...Not some other country which controls Mexico, USA and Canada.
2007-04-19 07:13:55 · update #1
Boom...It already is happening and it has nothing to do the Dem OR Rep because BOTH of them are in on it. Look at these sites to see what I am talking about!
This site explains the NAU and the SPP and why it is so dangerous:
http://www.freedom.org/naugreen2/player.html
This site is actual legislation from Idaho banning this from happening:
http://search.state.id.us/search97cgi/s97_cgi.exe?action=View&VdkVgwKey=http%3A%2F%2Fwww3%2Estate%2Eid%2Eus%2Foasis%2FHJM005%2Ehtml&doctype=raw&Collection=2007+Session+Legislation
This is a site which explains how Chertoff said in a memo that the DHS is UNDER the SPP which means that the DHS is UNDER what Mexico, the USA and Canada! If you go at the end of the article there are the actual documents from DHS which SAY this.
http://www.judicialwatch.org/6216.shtml
2007-04-19 07:52:27 · update #2
Why is Bush pushing so hard for the NAU?
I remember when his dad pushed so hard for the UN:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rc7i0wCFf8g
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XdxI0zClV_Y
2007-04-19 06:50:09 · answer #1 · answered by sarcasm_generator 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Another threat to our country we have to put a stop to, this time from within. I can't understand why a few people think they can decide the fate of a nation that has worked so hard for independence and self rule. We need MAJOR changes in policy and therefore of the administration. Lib or con, if you aren't for a free self ruled America you're going to be out of a job next election.
NO Steve North America is NOT a union now.
Thanks for the great links Hera.
2007-04-19 07:54:04 · answer #2 · answered by Sherilynne B 3 · 1⤊ 0⤋
For the ease of those who do not persist including your link, the substance of the records tale is Obama's appointment of Ron Kirk as commerce chief. The appointment of Ron Kirk is SURREAL even as taken alongside with Obama's campaign elements about NAFTA and typically about convalescing the lives of known human beings. If that appointment isn't adequate to persuade those that Obama is a CON, no longer something will be. They (Obama and his handlers and insiders) are growing so arrogant they don't seem even pretending to be on the component of the instantly ahead human beings any extra - as further and extra appointments are made that obviously teach the prestige quo will proceed ON ALL FRONTS. to respond to your question .... the Obama administration will follow a similar route because the Bush administration because they answer to a similar masters - the banksters and the corporate elite. to maintain u . s . a ., human beings ought to awaken in time for 2012 to vote in structure-pleasant politicians. it ought to already be too late. Can center type u . s . a . live to inform the tale yet another 4 years of the prestige quo? possibly yet its questionable. Can center type u . s . a . live to inform the tale yet another 8 YEARS of the prestige quo. truly no longer.
2016-12-04 07:45:38 · answer #3 · answered by ? 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Yes, I know about it, and the reasoning behind it, they will lower our wages, eliminate the middle class and therefore taking power from the people.
The Middle class is the only reason we are not in a full force police state. Look at communist countries.
there is no middle class, Poor people cant fight back the tyranny.
They open the borders, lower wages, export jobs, make everyone poor and then there is no means to fight back.
TOTAL SLAVERY
Just like north Korea
2007-04-19 06:48:55 · answer #4 · answered by jim c 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It is a case of good intentions being the road to hell. They have banned hate speech. What concerns me is who is to define hate speech? If you speak against my views and I have the final say, why shouldn't I announce your point of view is hate speech and send you to jail for it? I believe this another knee jerk reaction to a problem and may only in the end cause more problems. It is trying to legislate people's thoughts and opinions. Something that has proved to only harden those opinions. The only way to end hate is by educating people in a better way.
2007-04-19 06:46:49 · answer #5 · answered by Elizabeth Howard 6 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Only if the Lib give it away. Free trade is one thing but to give into and give up our National freedom is another. It made not be a game but I agree, no nation can take us on. If we close the borders down, we can support ourselves if need be. Yes we will have to step back a few years in things but we can do it.
2007-04-19 07:46:51 · answer #6 · answered by Boomrat 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
There will never be an actual North American Union.. Canadians would revolt first!
2007-04-19 07:10:03 · answer #7 · answered by Debra H 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Yep. Along with our sovereignty goes our civil rights.
2007-04-19 06:45:22 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 0⤋
Have you never played Risk? North America is lot easier to defend if you control all of it.
2007-04-19 06:44:04 · answer #9 · answered by Studbolt Slickrock Deux 4 · 1⤊ 3⤋
north america is a union now.
2007-04-19 06:50:04 · answer #10 · answered by vintagemale1951 5 · 0⤊ 3⤋