are history books accurate?

Answer 1

Not even

Answer 2

History is written from a given perspective. Those perspectives change based on authors and time of writing. History is believed to be entirely factual but in truth history is very fluid and open to interpretation.

An example of perspective changing history is seen in history books of World War 2. In the United States, it is generally accepted that Japan was the "bad guy" who started the war with the bombing of Pearl Harbor and the use of the atom bomb was justified to prevent the loss of many lives and to end the war. In Japan, the use of the atom bomb was totally unjustified and was as evil of an act as Hitler's concentration camps.

An example of time changing history is the American Civil War. Today, the common belief as taught in history books in schools is that the Civil War was fought over slavery. Books and newspapers of the last half of the 1800's would emphasis that the war was about states rights. Lincoln never intended to free slaves when he was first elected as president. He freed the slaves as a method to end the war. He believed that freeing the slaves would cripple the economy in the South and that free slaves would fight for the North. Both proved to be accurate.

Answer 3

Of course not. History is written by the victors and they do not report on their own crimes.

History is also a summary of events and like most summaries, they leave out details. For instance, the first launch of the space shuttle has been reduced to a bare sentence or two. What you don't know from that bare sentence is the shuttle went up with just two crew members after a week's worth of launch delays. Young and Crippen were the only ones aboard.

Answer 4

As Winston Churchill said "History is written by the victors", meaning the telling of history will be bias towards those who won. The other side will always be portrayed as the evil enemy, the winners are the righteous heroes.

So history books are likely bias, but do contain truth - as told by the winners.

Answer 5

History books are vetted by several sources so they are about as accurate as possible. But errors happen sometimes. Truth is a matter of perspective, there's a difference.

Answer 6

Your question is basiclly impossible. Europeans extra ailments which killed ninety% of the Indians. They then stole ninety 9% of the land that the survivors had, and, to this present day, cope with people who're left like 2nd-type voters. life expectancy for Indians is approximately 50 years. it incredibly is 72 for white human beings, eighty 5 or so for jap-American women who devour the classic healthful weight loss software (rice, fish, vegetables, no cheeseburgers) and don't smoke. toddler mortality for Indians is with regard to the comparable because it incredibly is in Kenya. Unemployment on reservations is forty%. No history e book has those unhappy little data. all of them conceal the reality. They do get 1620 correct, nevertheless.

Answer 7

It depends... For example, if you are a japanese reading on world war II written by a japanese, certain parts may not be reported.

Answer 8

depends on whose books they are.

Answer 9

How would anyone really know?