English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Gonzalez testified before that he knew little about the firings and had no direct involvement in the case.
This was bold-faced lie to which he now admits.

If I was on the committee I would ask him why he shouldn't be detained and prosecuted for purposely consciously lying and contempt of the US Senate?

And then I would have the Sargent-at-Arms come and stand by his side for the rest of his testimony.

He could take the 5th after that if he chose, and ask for a lawyer.

That's what the democrats need to do.
They are required to enforce the law. And the law says you msut be truthful in Congressional testimony.

2007-04-19 03:43:46 · 1 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government Other - Politics & Government

1 answers

He is under oath and if they catch him in a lie now, he will be toast. This was why he had to "practice, practice, practice" last week which lies he was going to tell and make them sound like the truth. He has a tough road to hoe.

2007-04-19 04:10:26 · answer #1 · answered by thequeenreigns 7 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers