English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

Do not take into consideration previous performances, previous statistics or idolization. Even though KP scored 70 runs more than Colly during the World Cup, i just would like your opinion as to which of them you thought performed better?

2007-04-19 02:21:00 · 31 answers · asked by angelcolly 2 in Sports Cricket

31 answers

Pieterson is excellent but him coming good with the bat is unpredictable.when you think he is gonna get a good score ,he gets out cheaply .like in the game against south africa.Collingwood has been more consistent and can handle pressure better than Pieterson.
So i say Collingwood.no isay Pieterson. no Collingwood.
baaah! who cares!

2007-04-25 20:51:27 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

I'm so sorry for you. You made it perfectly clear that you wanted previous performance excluded, and wanted an opinion of the two in this world cup. Most just ignored that. During this world cup KP was better, he scored more runs. If we and the selectors start rating batsmen by how few runs they score, then it will be even worse then it is now, if that's possible

2007-04-21 02:10:35 · answer #2 · answered by trouble_906 4 · 1 0

Kevin Pietersen

2007-04-23 04:34:26 · answer #3 · answered by ganesh r 2 · 0 0

Kevin Pietersen

2007-04-23 00:10:30 · answer #4 · answered by fairy 6 · 0 0

Kevin Pietersen

2007-04-19 06:14:45 · answer #5 · answered by arsenalsalam 2 · 0 0

I consider Paul Collingwood as the best batsman as he is more consistent than Pietersen.

2007-04-19 03:41:57 · answer #6 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 2 0

i might fee Alastair cook dinner earlier to KP in exams.cook dinner has been greater consistent than KP & he keeps the comparable composure throughout his innings.additionally cook dinner has undergone greater problematic circumstances than KP as an opener while KP had the convenience of dealing with the old ball interior the middle order. In ODIs KP is a lot greater applicable than cook dinner.cook dinner has been a sluggish starter in ODIs yet he has the flair to be an incredible odi batsman too. Ian bell is interior certainly one of those his life in this sequence.however the ingredient with bell replaced right into many of the cases on each and every occasion he scored,he replaced into honestly following the reliable initiate already presented via the impressive order.yet in this sequence he has been a lone fighter.Bell's checklist interior the subcontinent isn't reliable the two so KP & cook dinner might stand out earlier to bell.

2016-12-26 14:53:27 · answer #7 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Collingwood is the better player technically in my opinion. Pieterson is a slogger who will either get loads of runs or none at all. If I had to make a bet on who would score more runs my money would be on PC, he is more consistant because of his better temperament.

2007-04-20 02:41:04 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

to be honest i would have to say collingwood , i know KP is the best one day batsman but collingwood is more of an all rounder, he did very well un pressure lower down the order

2007-04-21 01:34:15 · answer #9 · answered by jenny m 2 · 1 0

I think Paul Collingwood is a better batsman... he has better technique than Kevin Pieterson...

2007-04-20 20:47:59 · answer #10 · answered by SnowFlake 2 · 1 0

fedest.com, questions and answers