If gun control would curb gun crime, how come Canada has low crime and high gun ownership?

Answer 1

Canada does have low crime, compared to the U.S.... but Canada does NOT have high gun ownership. Almost no one in Canada owns hand-guns and the procedure to qualify to buy a rifle is more intense than in the U.S.

Answer 2

Canada has low crime?! What the hell have you been smoking? Sure, compared to the States, or even some places in Europe it may seem low, but lemme tell you, folks, I've seen crime -particularly VIOLENT crime; particularly gang crime- explode in the last ten years. True, a lot of knives get used, but in my job I have to deal with my fair share of gangbangers, young punks and tweekers that for a time there a couple years back I seriously considered getting my license to carry. Preferably concealed...a nice big old Dirty Harry Magnum or something like that. But...once I'd done a little research into the matter, it turns out you have to go through so much f--king red tape in Canada to get a gun license, I just said "F--k it!". But, obviously, the criminals and gangbangers don't have these kinds of problems, do they?

Also, you want to keep in mind that a lot of Canada's "high gun ownership" is due to the fact there there is still a lot of hunting that goes up here in the Great White North...

All this talk about gun control is really a waste of time. A lot of people are blaming the gun laws for Virginia Tech- not due to the shooter, but due to the fact that the students couldn't protect themselves like they used to. Hell...did you know that, until two months before 9/11 pilot could carry guns? Imagine what a difference that could have made if they had't have changed the law. As far as I'm concerned, people should allowed to own and carry guns as a means to protect themselves. Correct me if I'm wrong, but the Founding Fathers or whoever it was wrote up the 2nd Amendment for a reason, didn't they?

Answer 3

They have better gun control laws. Legal gun ownership is high, but their laws keep illegal gun ownership to a minimum. Also, Canada is a socialist nation, they have more social programs to help people before they resort to crime.

Answer 4

the liberal government forced gun control legistration on us. we never got to vote on whether we wanted it or not. it doesn't deal with the cross-border flow of illegal guns coming into Canada. if gun registration was effective, perhaps the four Mounties killed in Mayerthorpe Alberta would still be alive. I think better education of gun ownership and stiff penalties for using a firearm in the commission of a crime would be a help. however, our laws here in Canada are lax at best.

Answer 5

I dont have any information yet somebody above me reported that places like England and Japan have an all out ban on firearms and thier crime value is contained in the path of the roof. This statment is absolutly authentic. i think that the crime expenses are so extreme even although we are allowed to hold firearms is via a failure contained in the criminal justice equipment. harder effects and longer penal complex sentances might desire to be enforced on people who dedicate crimes with firearms. in my opinion, an computerized 10 years might desire to be further directly to a sentance of somebody who has dedicated let's imagine an armed theft with a firearm. NO PAROLE AND NO sturdy TIME may be taken off of the hectic value. you start up giving those that plenty time in the back of bars, i will promise that the crime value will pass down. i think of what prevents human beings from breaking into residences whilst absolutely everyone seems to be domicile (domicile Invasions) is the incontrovertible fact that they dont comprehend whether or no longer you have a gun on your place. The State of recent Mexico does no longer have that substantial of a concern with automobile jackings through fact the voters are allowed to hold a gun it their autos. The state considers your automobile an extension of your place. Now in California, automobile jackings are outrageous through fact California regulation prohibits the donning of a firearm interior your automobile. So whilst a criminal desires to jack your automobile, he isn't disturbing approximately weapons through fact he's acquainted with you dont have one.

Answer 6

Excellent point. Also compare the crime rates of concealed carry states to those with stringent gun control laws. Concealed carry states have lower violent crime rates. Criminals are less likely to attack someone who can defend himself AND an armed populace can stop crimes in action. The police can't be everywhere...for the most part they can only mop up the mess after it is too late.

Answer 7

Because Canadians aren't exactly strong people. I mean, we're talking about a country that rode bicycles up onto the beaches at Normandy in WWII. Second, they are socialist, which means they are screwed up in the head. Capitalism is the only way to go. Every real Socialism has collapsed. China isn't a socialism, but is actually more of a Captialist-Socialist half-breed. Also, they have weird laws. For example, they have a handgun ban, yet one of the world's largest pistol manufacturer is based in Canada. Can you say "contradiction"?

Answer 8

Canada does not share a border with Mexico nor has millions of drug addicted so-called minorities that cause 85% of ALL violent crime.

Answer 9

Because the racial make up of Canada is much more light-skinned than the USA's. Statistically, the majority of violent crime is committed by blacks. This is not a racist statement - just statistical fact. If Canada had the equivalent number of blacks as the USA, her violent crime rate would also be equivalent.

Answer 10

Because someone is a lot less likely to pull a gun when twenty others will pull one on them.