We applaude the Supreme Court for standing up for un-born children. It seems we are returning to sense of morality by understand the murder of un-born children is wrong beyond belief. We can have hope that the slave owners were finally stopped after decades of not reconizing black people as human, the Nazi's were stopped from killing Jews and now we are one step closer to stopping the workers of murdering babies. It's hard to imagine that the pro-choice people, Nazi's, Slave-Owners could think the way they do regarding human life...BUT we may be one step closer to convincing them to placing value on human beings. Their arguments have always been the same: Blacks aren't people, Jew's are sub-human, un-born children are just tissue...slowly they are learning to think deeper. Remember the slave owner in his time believed he was correct, Nazi's really believed the Jew was not human, the pro-choice person really believes it's not a human either. They will all go down in history together!
2007-04-19 01:22:57 · 5 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
For ever linked....watch how they defend their "rights". Just like the ones before them!
They will be defeated
2007-04-19 01:24:11 · update #1
I hope they will be defeated. The difference between Germany killing Jews, and slave owners controlling, and using slaves, and abortion, is that the Jews, for the most part, and the slaves, for the most part, could fight for their lives, since they were already born Human. Unborn babies, fetuses, cells, whatever they can be called, cannot fight for their lives. They can't fight at all. They're just trying to grow. Why to some, is it wrong to want to be a baby?
2007-04-19 01:32:26 · answer #1 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 3⤊ 2⤋
I think your attitude that you "won" is arrogant. Women still have the right to a legal abortion, sorry pro-lifers. The "partial abortion" law has been in effect since 2003 when it was "Bushed".
You say you want to place value on human beings, yet you don't seem to care about the 15 yo girl who got pregnant or the single woman who can't afford to raise a child.
2007-04-19 02:24:16 · answer #2 · answered by Global warming ain't cool 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
I see this S. Ct. decision as ending infanticide. It should never have been called abortion in the first place. These were viable babies, partially born for the purpose of killing them.
I don't think we should continue to allow that barbaric practice to be called abortion.
Watch them scream about this, and it's hard to envision being closer to ending abortion.
2007-04-19 01:29:35 · answer #3 · answered by ? 7 · 0⤊ 2⤋
We are one step closer to a fascist dictatorship.
2007-04-19 02:02:14 · answer #4 · answered by Jabberwock 5 · 0⤊ 2⤋
i hope we have another jollycaust, its been too long!
2007-04-19 01:31:54 · answer #5 · answered by its not gay if... 2 · 0⤊ 2⤋