If your pro-life you must be just that "Pro-life" . You know, birth till death. A womans right to chooses. So where are you folks when it comes to issues regarding a womans right to choose? Where is the vigor, the energy you put towards the abortion issue when it comes to other "woman's right to choose" issues. Say...prostitution? Where is that big rally? You can't just pick "1" issue and neglect the others. When you guys "pow wow" next time, do it in the complete name of "womens rights" not just one issue. If you folks (a womans right to choose) fought for all the issues in public as you do for other issues (abortion) a few things may happen. 1) Your ranks may get divided because religious beleifs woudl seface and the guise would fall. A womans right is a womans right. Its not a church or state thing. Pick you battles wisely, grasshoppers - Your not even close to the war.
2007-04-19 01:08:18 · 13 answers · asked by Jim C 1 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
PRO-LIFE means you think every baby, unborn, has a right to life and that woman DONT have a right to choose. Prolife people fight for the rights of the unborn baby, male and female. Has nothing to do about womans rights.
I am pro-life. Abortion is murder.
2007-04-19 01:13:12 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
You ramble in your question and I'm not certain I completely understand you but I think you are attacking the pro-choice people.
Pro lifers are only focused on one issue also. Abortion. They have no problem supporting the war in Iraq, they have no problem supporting the death penalty. Does one negate the other?
I personally support all women's rights. Although I prefer to think of it as equality for all.
The only issue I have with prostitution is that some are forced into it. If an adult elects to be a ho that is her choice and if men elect to pay for sex I think that is their choice also. Prostitution is against the law though, I don't care enough about the issue to argue for or against it because I think women demean themselves when they allow men to use them as a sexual object but that is my personal belief. Just as I would never have an abortion but I support the right to choose.
2007-04-19 01:18:20 · answer #2 · answered by MI 6 · 3⤊ 0⤋
An absolute professional determination politician. i'm professional determination, yet even i think of there might desire to be limits. Obama is going way too a good distance. i do no longer think of there might desire to be previous due term abortions and in assessment to Obama, if an toddler survives an abortion, it would take transport of all rights and given scientific interest.
2016-12-29 09:33:07 · answer #3 · answered by kunich 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Amen brother.....
we should be able to choose for ourselves not have some government or religon tellin us what is and what isn´t good for us, or what is or isn´t moral.....
it all depends on the situation, the same action in one situation could be a good decision and the right thing to do, where put it in a different situation and one might be able to even call it evil......
too many people in this world have closed minds, and some i would say don´t even have minds at all.
2007-04-19 01:15:16 · answer #4 · answered by James R 3 · 3⤊ 0⤋
I've noticed the pro-choice crowd doesn't seem to respect a woman's right to choose to stay home and mother her children, either.
Your question is a bit confusing because you started with the pro-life position. But it isn't as confusing as some are making it out to be.
2007-04-19 01:13:44 · answer #5 · answered by ? 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
~Reading your question confuses me, I see I'm not the only one. I'm pro-choice for pregnancies and anti-prostitution.
Abortion is legal, prostitution is not. They are two separate issues.
I'm not trying to win a "war," every thing's fine where I stand.~
2007-04-19 01:39:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
if you are right, then i have the right to kill my husband because ive decided he is no longer convinient for me. it is my choice, after all. and, hell, motherhood is alot harder than i thought it would be, so off with the kids as well. ya know, because it my life and my choice!
im extremely pro-life in the abortion debate, but do believe in a persons right to choose many things. hey, you want to be a paid slut, go on! any other laws you wanna break? have at it! and ill keep carrying the gun i choose to have, and we will see who comes out on top!
by the way, pro-lifers arent fighting for womens rights... pro-choicers are. and pro-choicers leave religion out of it. get your facts straight, grasshopper!
2007-04-19 01:24:41 · answer #7 · answered by crystal k 2 · 3⤊ 2⤋
Its not about a woman's 'right' to choose in general. It is about her 'right' to kill her unborn child simply because it is inconvienienent. This is not a natural right, this isnt even a humane right. This is mass murder. If a girl wants to sleep around (prostitution), let her defile herself, but abortion requires her to take someone else's life (the uinborn child). Embryologists agree that life starts at conception, not birth. It isnt about religion, but it is about right and wrong. Morals is a part of law, as a matter of fact it is the foundation of law (Thou shall not murder, thou shall not steal, etc). To be pro-life means to be pro-life, from the beginning of life (conception) to death.
2007-04-19 01:17:22 · answer #8 · answered by Daniel 6 · 1⤊ 3⤋
I say unless you 1. Have a uterus and 2. Have ever feared for your safety or worried about getting raped, that you need to get off your pedastal and try to have a little empathy, or if you can't do that, then keep your mouth shut.
Secondly, what in the hell is your question even trying to ask?
2007-04-19 01:25:51 · answer #9 · answered by barnaclesally 3 · 1⤊ 2⤋
If we could chose we would but not all would . Pro-life are all so against the death penalty. GOOD BLESS
2007-04-19 01:21:42 · answer #10 · answered by TCC Revolution 6 · 0⤊ 0⤋