Conservatives do know that evolutionary theory is a fact don't they?

Question

I've heard people say that cons don't believe evolutionary theory. I don't believe it. I know cons are ignorant, but to accuse them of that is uncalled for. I want cons to show up and say they are not that ignorant.

tttplttt, are you accusing me of sarcasm ?

George D, You are not helping me. I will have to admit that I'm wrong if I get more responses like yours.

It's a "theory" in name only.

mark g, it's a small miracle that you learned to write. You know just enough to communicate how ignorant you are.

O.K. I admit it. I was wrong. Your typical con ( although there are certainly exceptions) is ignorant enough to think that evolution is still a theory. The fact is that it's called a "theory" to keep from offending cons with yet another uncomfortable reality.

Huh.......is there any chance.....any chance at all....that huh.....we can convince you cons that global warming is real ? Didn't think so.

Answer 1

Evolution has been witnessed at both the microscopic and macroscopic levels. Researchers have witnessed species evolving from insects kept in captivity.

However, these retarded - and I DO mean retarded, in the social, intellectual, and spiritual manner - creationists wont believe in evolution until they see a "dog turn into a cat". They actually believe science is dictated by a show of hands over real laboratory experiments. They believe that Creationism is somehow a valid default if they were somehow able to poke holes in the theory of evolution.

Evolution is a theory in the same way that gravity is a theory. They are highly supported to the point where denying them is immediately and quite correctly looked upon with absolute absurdity.

A conjecture, on the other hand, is a wild guess with no evidence to support it. The notion that "god exists" is a conjecture, based on religious faith. The notion that "god created the universe and everything in it" is a double conjecture, based on the same religious faith taken to the point of voluntary schizophrenia.

Creationists are simply incapable of scientific achievement or intellectual discussion. Every last one of them should be rounded up and ground up.

Answer 2

Christ almighty - Did all these cons flunk high school science? Evolution is a fact - and a theory. The fact is evolution happened and continues to happen all the time. 99% of the species that have existed on the earth are extinct. It's so well proven only a dumb fundie moonbat could not believe it. The "theory" is how the different sciences are tied together that explain it. Generals study war theory - it doesn't make wars untrue. Morons.

Answer 3

Sir,
A theory is a theory. A theory is not fact. Evolution or Natural Selection explains a lot. It does not explain everything.

Religious beliefs are not facts either. The difference is, the religious people seem to realize this but the non-religious do not.


.

Answer 4

Nope and my Liberal friend does not believe it either. To be a fact it would have to be called scientific law, While the majority of scientists believe the Theory of evolution, there are alot of scientists that do not. Those in the field of astronomy and Micro Biology are starting to question Darwin's theory more and more. Too bad you didn't take the time to question everything you heard in school yourself.

Answer 5

i'm no longer conservative yet i will work out Perry's factor. i'm no molecular biologist so perchance my perspectives heavily isn't as justified as others.... yet i will at once %. out 2 significant gaps in evolutionism. a million) It would not clarify the creation of life. whilst it does clarify how life evolves into extra complicated organisms, it would not clarify the preliminary creation of life. the theory of abiogenesis tries to erase that hollow...yet it is in basic terms an theory as properly that in basic terms as relatively be refuted because it relatively is properly-known. 2) If all life stepped forward from one organism (as maximum evolutionists have self belief), then how do you clarify the mammoth quantity of selection stemming from life contained in one specific section. What I mean by using this.. life evolves from its ecosystem... its DNA modifications to extra useful tournament itself to its ecosystem. whilst over the years this might clarify species version and whatnot... what with regard to the genetic version that happens in one specific section (say a small pond or a lake) that derives many distinctive species from one place? it would might desire to point at random genetic mutations that isn't unavoidably help the organism cope to its ecosystem. this skill that DNA mutation is extra of a game of risk than the rest..... then contained in the extra desirable scheme of issues those opportunities created life so state-of-the-artwork it may actually replace its ecosystem. This seems slightly far fetched... so i will definitley see the attitude from clever layout proponents, whether i've got not got self belief in clever layout myself. To make it sparkling, I do have self belief in evolution. i do no longer, even although, comprehend why evoluionists have this variety of tricky on whilst somebody tries to refute evolution. Ultimatley, we'd on no account comprehend the actual clarification in the back of life... evolution may be an impressive theory that could help us clarify life... yet becuase we don't comprehend the authentic nature of life or the muse of its life...evolution will stay an theory. Is there something incorrect with that? i presumed the entire factor of technological expertise grow to be to be open minded enought o dispute even the main properly-known paradigms. In that.. I consider Perry.

Answer 6

Please prove your fact:

1 - Show us evidence of all intermediate species. Darwin's "fact" says that they existed.

2 - Compare and contrast the "fact" of evolution with the second law of thermodynamics.

3 - Tell us your opinion of the "fact" that evolution is "the preservation of favored races in the struggle for life."

Answer 7

Tut, tut... How can nyone accuse you of sarcasm on this issue.

I am going to do a quick search to see if there is monetary gain in evolutionary theory.. I wonder if that will help them change their minds.

Answer 8

Explain this to me, then. If Evolution is a fact? How was my Ex-Wife created? Certainly not by evolvoving from anything.

Answer 9

May i address the "fact" that "you" are "ignorant" to claim that you "know all" conservatives are ignorant. Have a nice day.;)

May i also suggest that you ask senator Barbara Boxer what my "opinion" is on "Global Warming", but that's right "you" know, "for a fact", all conservatives "are ignorant". Which raises this question. "How" much "do you" think you really "know for sure?"

Answer 10

A theory is not a fact. Think before you contradict your own self.