English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

I think the nba is great how it is, another team just makes things more messy and cluttered/confusing.

Thoughts>?

2007-04-17 20:02:25 · 12 answers · asked by Anonymous in Sports Basketball

12 answers

Bad possibility, Oklahoma City should be next in line to get one.Also Las Vegas had a chance with the All Star game,but it didn't turn out good.Oklahoma City took in the Hornets after Katrina and did wonders with them.They sold out the Ford Center 30 times.They also turned around the franchise to be playoff contenders the past two years.I can see Las Vegas getting a team,but Oklahoma City has a better chance.

2007-04-18 06:48:39 · answer #1 · answered by Topher 5 · 0 0

The Sonics could move there, since that owner wants out of Seattle.

The NBA has no integrity any more anyway, why not put a team in Las Vegas?

2007-04-18 03:48:20 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

The NBA season is already long enough, there are too many games to watch 80 + games each regular season ?

Why not spend that money on the community, like a new hospital, school, museums, and culture centers.

The NBA only sucks up our hard earned money and puts it in the hands of a select few. Look how rich the players are, and how much richer they keep getting.

How does this help the community ?

2007-04-17 20:30:37 · answer #3 · answered by Whitman Lam 5 · 0 0

I would, but not right now with what happened when we held the All-Star game. Alot went on with Las Vegas, and you can thank that thug Adam "Pacman" Jones for letting it rain. I really think the NHL can benefit with this, because it's no longer a major sport now that NASCAR has taken the spot away from the NHL. For them to put a team out here before the NBA, will help them tremendously.

2007-04-17 20:09:09 · answer #4 · answered by *One Of A Kind* 4 · 0 0

I don't have anything against Las Vegas having a team but the league is too big and the talent spread thin. I came up in the Sixties when dynasties were common in all sports. I know that isn't the case now but mediocrity is commonplace anymore.

If an existing franchise moves thats okay, but no more expansion for me.

2007-04-17 20:08:07 · answer #5 · answered by Awesome Bill 7 · 0 0

Yes, but no more then 30-32 teams! Maybe the Sonics can move there or even the Grizzles! 82 games is enough and I don't like not playing a team in your conference 4 times. One team is ok but not 2 or 3.

2007-04-17 20:32:15 · answer #6 · answered by maestrosantana 5 · 0 0

i would like to see 64 teams, every state should have at least 1. the state college all stars should form a team when they get out of school and the largest city in each state should have one. and maybe the 14 biggest states should have 2 teams. if the students go to another state to go to school on a scholarship then that state has the right to claim that student as a first round draft since they spent all that money to educate and support that athlete/student.

2007-04-17 20:05:28 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 0 1

hahaha. Its in simple terms people could be puzzled which activity to bypass - activity of Basketball or activity of on line casino? yet Las Vegas Aces sounds reliable. Their jersey could exhibit Black and grey with Ace Card in 40 5 degree. :)

2016-11-25 19:07:40 · answer #8 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

Sure, why not. Let's throw another California team in there.

2007-04-17 20:07:02 · answer #9 · answered by Jengers 4 · 0 0

HOW ABOUT ANOTHER CALI TEAM IONO HOW ABOUT SAN DIEGO

2007-04-17 20:18:13 · answer #10 · answered by BUGGZ 3 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers