English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

The first two shooting was at 7:15 which resulted in 2 deaths, the second was purely massacre at 9:45 and resulted in 30 deaths, why didn't they evaculate the Campus with all that time? Do they think door locks are bulletproof or something? This also proves that they were not prepared for this even though something similar happened in the past at other schools

2007-04-17 19:26:37 · 10 answers · asked by John 1 in News & Events Media & Journalism

10 answers

First let's say, we all want answers. Now is not the time to be pointing fingers at the cops or adminstration. Let's focus on the students, faculty, and staff of VT in their terrible time and ask what do they need? How can we help?-Sports Radio's Jim Rome

Let's view VT as a small city. If a person is shot in a small town of say 40,000+, a perimeter is set up along several blocks and then tightened to isolate the shooter. Whole city's don't get shut down every time there is a murder. -a person on CNN

You want to make the world safer? Buy kids bicycle helmets. Far more bike riding kids are killed each year in an easily preventable scenario. This is the first massacre of it's kind on a U.S. campus in over 40 years. How can you build a profile if the event is so rarely occuring? -also a viewpoint from a CNN interview

I've got a friend who teaches in a public HS & he said they do drills in the summer without kids and if a well armed person comes onto a campus, all hell breaks loose before first responders and back up support can get their operation up & running. Police officers train and put their lives on the line every day in scenarios like this, in routine traffics stops with cars having tinted windows anda concealed weapon. Our world is far better with the men in blue than without.

My heart goes out to the people affected by these horrendous events.

2007-04-17 22:51:32 · answer #1 · answered by Xander 2 · 0 0

My home page is CNN. Apparently, one of his teachers reported his strange
behaviour to the police and the University but they ignored her. They found out
after his killing spree that he had plans for bombs, etc. in his room. I don't
understand knowing all this, why the alert didn't go out sooner. My heart aches
for the families of those that died and for those that survived with and without
injuries. In Canada we have had several incidents. One was a 40 minute drive
from where we live. A friend of ours was an ex police man who was now a teacher. He tried to save the lives of the kids and was shot in the process. What caused it? A kid whose girlfriend broke up with him and he came in and
started shooting. You probably heard about the female engineering students
in Montreal and Jason who was murdered out west. Why? He was a Christian. Who can understand why these things happen. But when that
teacher reported this kid and had him removed from her classroom, why
didn't the school or the police act? I don't know. We may never know about
that.

2007-04-17 19:42:17 · answer #2 · answered by Garnet 6 · 0 0

The president of the school seemed to be pretty willing to talk about the event and he seemed decently prepared but not for anything like that. you're never prepared for a slaughter nor could you ever expect one. VT is the size of a small city and when someone gets killed on one side of the town you don't shut down the whole town. they had reason to believe that the gunman had left the premises. this whole thing just changes the rules of how campuses will handle security and i imagine more campuses will enlist better trained guards and probably more of them

2007-04-17 19:41:38 · answer #3 · answered by Wes 5 · 1 0

"Why does God enable specific issues take place?" What are the probabilities? a million. God isn't all-efficient and subsequently won't be able to ward off many undesirable issues from occurring. 2. God isn't all-loving and subsequently does not constantly care that those issues take place. 3. God isn't all-understanding and subsequently can no longer are awaiting those activities so he's each so often as greatly surprised as we are. 4. God has a plan and by some ability each and all of the discomfort, injustice, and imperfection we % out by some ability fits into that plan. it might look to me that if 4 is the respond then God won't be all-efficient, and so on. - those in simple terms being nonsensical recommendations that theologians got here up with so God does no longer be offended with them for no longer praising him severe sufficient. In Exodus 3:14 Moses asks the being he's taking to be God what his call is. the classic answer is that he mentioned "i'm that i'm" - certainly one of those lends to this concept of a static, all-(fill in in spite of you elect) form of "i'm" God that by no ability transformations, yet in simple terms form of is, continuously and ever. the reality nonetheless is that the verb interior the unique Hebrew of Exodus 3:14 is interior the destiny demanding ("i'm" relatively demands the present demanding verb). interior the footnotes of the NIV translation they supply yet another translation of "i would be what i would be" which makes some sense to me. perchance God isn't some static "i'm" yet is starting to be what he chooses to alter into and the imperfect worldwide we see is a manifestation of that starting to be? perchance if God lives in all persons, a perception that some have, then there's no suffering that any one reports that God isn't there, appropriate alongside with them, experiencing that suffering and discomfort too? So perchance God isn't a hypocrite - he by no ability asks every physique to journey something that he does not additionally journey? lwk

2016-11-25 03:00:19 · answer #4 · answered by ? 4 · 0 0

I know I heard one media station had an interview with someone from the staff or administration at the college and it was asked to them. Why weren't you dismissing people or shutting stuff down. He replied "They thought they were saving peoples lives if they didn't let people go." Maybe the shooting rampage could have been more lives gone if the shooter was out seeing people walking and running scared. I don't know.... Good question though.

2007-04-17 19:32:38 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

They were not prepared - despite the recent bomb threats to the school .

2007-04-17 19:30:52 · answer #6 · answered by missmayzie 7 · 1 0

I know its the schools fault.

2007-04-17 19:36:10 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

they did not want to loose money by doing that.

2007-04-17 20:23:49 · answer #8 · answered by RANDELL 7 · 0 0

i dont know

2007-04-17 19:29:56 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

read my post!!!!

2007-04-17 19:36:08 · answer #10 · answered by J B 1 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers