I've yet to hear that argument, but I have heard repeatedly liberals exclaiming, "See! Gun control! Gun control!" They are the ones capitalizing on the tragedy. I suppose they'll stop using those "talking points" when people stop trying to use a situation where someone obtained guns illegally to take the rights away from people who obtain them through the law, especially in this situation where concealed weapons were already banned from campus. The actual talking points I've heard from Republicans have been things more along the lines of, "I wonder how different the day would have been if liscenced gun holders HAD been allowed to carry on campus."
2007-04-17 16:34:11
·
answer #1
·
answered by rumezzo 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
As long as liberals keep giving interviews wanting guns banned would be my guess. I have seen at least a dozen so far. We have seen the Democrats sneak through liberal laws before. The 4th amendment rights are not debatable.
2007-04-17 17:08:03
·
answer #2
·
answered by Wolfpacker 6
·
1⤊
0⤋
in accordance to Obama he needed to have serial numbers located on each bullet however the manufacturers might have had to retool all of their kit to do it. Therefor Obama DID want to regulate it to a level. Ever go out to purchase ammo these days ? you're constrained to quantity this is why maximum individuals will visit 3 distinctive shops to get it rather of basically going to a minimum of one. additionally word that the government and regulation Enforcement have been in a position to purchase super parts of the extra time-honored high quality subsequently proscribing the quantity a citizen would desire to purchase. He would not would desire to go after the 2nd modification...he basically finally ends up controlling the quantity of ammunition on the open marketplace.
2016-10-22 11:46:18
·
answer #3
·
answered by arleta 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
From your question, might I be right if I drew the conclusion that you are for the restriction guns in the US?
If that be the case, will fight you all the way from here to hell and back.Don't care what you think of our 2nd Amendment. My thoughts and those of the Supreme Court so far...give me that right...You want to take my 2nd Amendment...Dude...you've got one hell of a fight on your hands...
Ok, you 2nd Amendment haters...get your dirty little thumbs down and go to town.....
2007-04-17 16:31:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I am Liberal, own guns and value my Constitutional Right to have them, but there has to be a limit on weapons designed for fast reload and large clips, especially handguns. Pistols have nothing to do with the right to keep and bear arms for the defense of liberty and would not be my weapon of choice...they are about concealment
2007-04-17 16:45:33
·
answer #5
·
answered by Ford Prefect 7
·
0⤊
2⤋
I am sick of hearing about liberal this or liberal that.
Im an American dam it!
I hate Bush because I am an American and I have the freedom to do so!
That and he did let Osoma get away, and invaded a country for personal revenge, and he hates homosexuals, I dont know why, homosexuals are scared of there own shadows, I never had one threaten to hurt me!
Did have one want to have sex once, I was flattered but said no!
Still I am tired of everytime some one asks Bush to pull out of Iraq he starts screaming Liberals hate our troops.
I am tired of hearing it!
2007-04-17 16:48:07
·
answer #6
·
answered by onesinnergirl 2
·
0⤊
3⤋
Every chance they can until that ploy no longer works. They use fear all the time, insinuating those that are concerned about gun deaths are actually going to come after legitimate gun owners, taking their guns away and worse. It has worked for decades, so I don't imagine they will stop anytime soon.
2007-04-17 16:27:15
·
answer #7
·
answered by michaelsan 6
·
2⤊
4⤋
liberals do want our guns
2007-04-17 16:55:17
·
answer #8
·
answered by Anonymous
·
2⤊
0⤋
I like how they think that if everyone had a gun, shootings would somehow decline because everyone would be afraid of being shot back at. That always cracks me up.. It's kind of like saying, "if murder was legal, there'd be no murders" because the murderer would be afraid of getting murdered himself.. They make my head spin sometimes..
2007-04-17 16:32:05
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
5⤋
As long as it takes to keep us distracted from the disaster of Iraq....
2007-04-17 16:26:45
·
answer #10
·
answered by Truth 5
·
3⤊
4⤋