Seriously, its been proven that man is not causing "global warming" and that "global warming" is actually just one of earth's many heating and cooling cycles.
2007-04-17
15:18:53
·
15 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Politics & Government
➔ Politics
yeah, and to the guy with the freaky cat pic, just cause a poll says that people believe what al gore made a movie about doesn't mean its true.
they could have polled ten people for all I know.
2007-04-17
18:30:43 ·
update #1
Just so you all know, global warming IS political, at least partially.
I posted this question in both the politics section and again in the environment or something along those lines section.
If Global warming is not political, then why are so many politicians talking about it so much?
2007-04-17
18:34:41 ·
update #2
Well, ABC still thinks man is involved and is going to do a special this Friday but I am not going to tune in.
I'm guessing they will leave out the cycles and the fact that the sun is producing more heat right now. I don't think man can be blamed for the ice caps on mars for melting.
2007-04-17 15:23:33
·
answer #1
·
answered by az 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
there are many things that can cause global warming, we humans produce many of these, e.g. think of how many people use body deodorants every day, how many drive, how many throw cart board papers and plastic bags on the streets etc... these things are very simple and you may not even think its causing global warming but the fact is by turning your lights on you have just added a tiny bet more of those carbon emission gases into the atmosphere. so we are causing it, the cycle you speak of is true but heat temperatures are rising by far faster than it should. by the time the cycle changes back to cooler temperates life on earth would probably be a lot harder than it is now, global warming may not even be an issue but finding water that is not poisoned with carbon dioxide or acid rain. by then cooling the planet will probably be another problem because we may then freeze because the layers on the upper atmosphere may have changed too. god knows what other changes will come. its not our problem true, but our children will have suffer a lot more from this. forgods sake think about, out of all the places we have explored only one single rock has the ability to create life, its about a size of a dot comparing to our solar system and its the only place where life can exist, if we loose this world we wont be able to find another like it in a very long time, we may not even find another at all. we have a great history here and we dont need to loose it just because some coorporations dont want to loose money. money is just a paper that runs business, earth keeps us alive. the reason politicians are involved is because they are the ny ones that have power ti change it, reducing carbom emissions require investing a lot of money in new technologies and making sure that all companies use them. its a big issue, the only people in the world that dont belive in this is US and China. they are the world most producers of these gases too. so that explains why they dont wnt to belive it.
2007-04-17 15:40:04
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
2⤋
surely international warming has no longer been shown to be using organic fluctuations; even though it stands to reason that 6 billion human beings all burning fossil fuels accepted and generating almost 7 billion a variety of of CO2 each year would particularly be having an result on earth's climate. fairly because of the fact the Earth has never had CO2 above 3 hundred ppm in its ecosystem in the final seven-hundred,000 years and it incredibly is at present at 383 ppm. So the place is all of this CO2 coming from in spite of if it is not from human interest? 7 billion a variety of of CO2 is comparable to the entire quantity of ecosystem that exists above California. this ability that if we replace the air above the state of California from the floor as much as the sting of the ambience with CO2, that's the equivalent of quantity of CO2 gasoline that human beings placed into the ambience each twelve months. Now, after the final 50 years, this is comparable to with regards to the entire quantity of air that exists above the USA. this is a superb type of CO2! Disperse that quantity over the entire planet and that i might say that this is an significant contribution to the composition of the ambience. that would not even comprise the extra warmth trapping gases alongside with methane and nitrous oxide that have additionally been released. So, to have confidence that international warming is a organic cycle uninfluenced via human beings is the comparable as believing that a fat guy ought to surely fly in a sleigh to all the little girls and boys of the international in 24 hours to grant presents of love or coal to those who're deemed astounding or naughty respectively. So, good success with that, moron.
2016-10-22 11:39:31
·
answer #3
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Global warming is a myth, just like the global cooling myth in the early 1970s. We don't have that much power over the earth.
Beside, are we looking at the same people that predict the weather for information? The same people that said last year's hurricane season was going to be really bad. The same ones that said CA was going to have a warm wet winter - we were cold and dry. These people can't even accurately predict the weather 5 days out!
2007-04-17 15:44:05
·
answer #4
·
answered by JessicaRabbit 6
·
1⤊
2⤋
There are zero peer reviewed scientific studies that refute that our current global warming is not caused at least partly by man.None,nada,zip!Cite one if you can.But I feel very safe making that challenge because,as I said,there are not any.You will find a few crackpots amongst the thousands and thousands of scientists in the world,who are willing to spout whatever Exxon or DuPont would like them to say.So to answer your question"Who still thinks,etc."that would be anyone who is aware of the facts.Why do you right wingnuts insist on making this political?You are playing into the hands of the rich folks who have a lot to gain by deffering responsibility.
2007-04-17 17:42:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by R B 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
I honestly didn't believe in global warming at all until I began to watch the discovery channel on Sunday nights at 8 pm, Planet Earth. Whether it is us, people, or something else we need to be aware what is going on and everyone needs to do what they can to slow down global warming.
Planet Earth is the best thing I've ever seen on television.♥♥
2007-04-17 15:32:35
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
1⤋
Oh really? Proven by who? Most scientists now believe that although Earth does go through cycles of warming and cooling, the present warming is much more than just a cycle.
I guess you believe all that greenhouse gas that we produce is harmless.
Do some research, stop listening to Rush Limbaugh, and wake up.
2007-04-17 15:30:06
·
answer #7
·
answered by opjames 4
·
1⤊
3⤋
Denial of proven science will not save your ignorant rectal cavity from the coming effects of global warming.
Perhaps you can use Fatso Limbaugh as a life raft when the flooding begins.
Maybe we all can.
2007-04-17 15:47:36
·
answer #8
·
answered by marianddoc 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
Okay, duh. Whether or not we cause it we need to do what we can to alleviate it and to prepare for the flooding of low lying areas, little island countries and lowlands that will go under water. It being a natural cycle doesn't mean we don't have to work on it.
2007-04-17 15:22:57
·
answer #9
·
answered by ash 7
·
4⤊
0⤋
Remember, the onus is on the global warming nuts to prove it exists. They cannot. It is not provable.
2007-04-17 15:32:19
·
answer #10
·
answered by Chainsaw 6
·
2⤊
2⤋