How is Romeo and Juliet considered an Aristole's Tragedy?

Question

and what is the hamartia of Romeo and Juliet?

Answer 1

Aristotle believed in the following the Unities, guidlines which he set up for Greek drama, especially tragedy


-The unity of action: a play should have one main action that it follows, with no or few subplots.
-The unity of place: a play should cover a single physical space and should not attempt to compress geography, nor should the stage represent more than one place.
-The unity of time: the action in a play should take place over no more than 24 hours.
Aristotle dealt with the unity of action in some detail, under the general subject of "definition of tragedy", where he wrote:

Now, according to our definition, Tragedy is an imitation of an action that is complete, and whole, and of a certain magnitude … As therefore, in the other imitative arts, the imitation is one when the object imitated is one, so the plot, being an imitation of an action, must imitate one action and that a whole, the structural union of the parts being such that, if any one of them is displaced or removed, the whole will be disjointed and disturbed. For a thing whose presence or absence makes no visible difference, is not an organic part of the whole.
His only reference to the time in the fictive world is in a distinction between the epic and tragic forms:

Epic poetry agrees with Tragedy in so far as it is an imitation in verse of characters of a higher type. They differ, in that Epic poetry admits but one kind of metre, and is narrative in form. They differ, again, in their length: for Tragedy endeavours, as far as possible, to confine itself to a single revolution of the sun, or but slightly to exceed this limit; whereas the Epic action has no limits of time.

Answer 2

because Shakespeare had a humorousness. The play is about youthful love, and how all young ones imagine each romance is the single, etc (in basic terms seem at how Romeo so instantly jumps from Rosaline to Juliet). In that sense, up till the most suitable act, the full play is hilarious. a lot so, that maximum students imagine Romeo and Juliet replaced into written to instantly juxtapose Midsummer evening's Dream (which replaced into released round a similar time and stocks an fairly similar plot) as Shakespeare's play on "comedies bring about weddings, tragedies bring about funerals". Act 5 is needed, even with the actuality that, as a turning element. The willingness to die for this "love" (even no matter if it truly is naive lust) and the total thing about the prose is what compels even modern audiences to bear in mind the intensity and eventual heartbreak of their previous love. that's no longer a lot the tale itself because the telling of the tale that makes the play a love tale.