and bill clinton
2007-04-17 14:38:04 · 24 answers · asked by ? 3 in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Cuz he/she is stupid.
That's why.
2007-04-17 14:41:42 · answer #1 · answered by BooYa 2 · 5⤊ 6⤋
Wow, i don't recognize if i have ever seen a extra vicious and bitter man or woman than Ann Coulter. If she is regarded to as an ethical beacon via the right, then they're in route of the party of Musollini than I even predicted.
2016-12-04 05:31:45 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
I don't believe that Anne Coulter actually believes that John Edwards is Gay, as he is married to a woman. I think she might have been referencing the fact that he looks pretty enough to be Gay. Don't take this the wrong way, as Gay men generally take better care of themselves than many Hetero men.
I mean how many Heterosexual men would spend 400 bucks to have their hair styled, as Edwards did recently?
2007-04-17 14:48:26 · answer #3 · answered by Eric K 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
Ann Coulter did so because she thought it was a way to question his ability to lead. That is, by accusing him of being homosexual--an accusation that is so off the mark and needlessly inflammatory that it raises questions about Ms. Coulter's own sexuality-- she thinks (perhaps correctly) that Americans would find him unworthy of leading.
Ms. Coulter is an individual whose time has come and gone. She was a creature (and I use the term advisedly) of the early 21st century, whose rhetoric and opinions are increasingly seen (even by conservatives) as repulsive and mendacious.
Good riddance to bad trash.
2007-04-17 14:49:29 · answer #4 · answered by blueevent47 5 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Honest answer- Have you seen Edward's video of 5 minutes primping and playing with his hair!! But I think Coulter was alluding to, in clumsy fashion albeit, that Edwards and his ilk- Clinton- have no stomach for war and are that way- emasculated.
2007-04-17 14:47:04 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 4⤋
Agree or Disagree is besides the Point can you look at Edwards, and with a straight face , say that you think he
looks like a MAN.
2007-04-17 14:47:52 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 3⤋
...because she's just a big-mouthed, sensationalist, media biotch. She knows how to work the system with the worst of them.
Hopefully, no one recognizes her as any kind of legitimate journalist or commentator.
She wouldn't be worthy to stand on the same stage as people like E.R. Murrow, Walter Cronkite, Andy Rooney, or Bill Moyers.
2007-04-17 14:51:40 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 3⤋
If it takes one to know one then she was letting him know she is one and then maybe might hook her up with some hottie Democrat babes for some free lovin and party time on the sly.....
2007-04-17 14:48:11 · answer #8 · answered by Your Teeth or Mine? 5 · 0⤊ 1⤋
She didn't say he was gay, she called him a f*g. While two and two go together, stating that someone is gay is usually meant to be making a statement that they are whereas using the other term is being derogatory to gays or an insult to someone you know is straight that they're a wuss. It was an insult, duh.
2007-04-17 14:45:30 · answer #9 · answered by Corrine 2 · 2⤊ 1⤋
Because she is, is right. Have you ever seen an adams apple like that on a woman? She's one now but I wouldn't bet on it ten or so years ago.
2007-04-17 14:45:55 · answer #10 · answered by opinionator 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
I think she wanted to call him a pus$y, but she knew
she couldn't get away with it.
Something about Edwards not wanting to debate on Fox.
Who could blame him? There's no debating on Fox,
just bashing.
2007-04-17 14:45:30 · answer #11 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 3⤋