I say it takes two good parents and the nitwits in the left wing village should keep their busybody noses out of it. What do you think?
2007-04-17
14:32:23
·
12 answers
·
asked by
Anonymous
in
Society & Culture
➔ Other - Society & Culture
Kinda shocking how many people don't get it. Saying the village buts out doesn't mean the kid is locked in a closet all day. Don't you people get it? "The village" is code for big government socialists like Hitlery wanting to take even more control of your lives. After all, she knows better than you what you should do with your life, right?
2007-04-17
15:52:12 ·
update #1
I agree with you 100%
Hillary should have used better ghostwriters
2007-04-17 14:34:54
·
answer #1
·
answered by ? 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
It takes 2 loving and caring and supportive parents to raise a child. It takes the village to give the child life situations and lessons to work out.
2007-04-17 15:07:48
·
answer #2
·
answered by Samantha 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
well in a way its not just our parents that raised us. parents had to work so we were put in daycare where we met other kids and we learned from them and the teacher who we also learned from. so in a way the village does raise the children. but the 2 parents does have a better influence on the child because they seem to listen to the parents more
2007-04-17 14:48:21
·
answer #3
·
answered by Dont get Infected 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
It is not the government's job to interfere with parents and how they raise their child. Perhaps the government should make it mandatory for all expecting parents to take a parenting course. Or even better, let's get rid of all the stupid useless high school courses like literature and foreign languages and replace them with useful courses like parenting and how to file your own tax return.
2007-04-17 14:39:55
·
answer #4
·
answered by Anonymous
·
1⤊
0⤋
i'm uncertain if i might document an avatar, even though that could matter on what it depicts, yet universal, I do believe you. there are a number of little ones making use of this website and if i've got confidence something is beside the point or would reason offense i'll document it. it incredibly is then as much as Yahoo, in the event that they eliminate the content or no longer. additionally, I answer questions in the psychological wellbeing section plenty too, and a superb type of of the posts in that section in many situations persist with the lines of "How do I kill myself?" i've got confidence those type of questions should not be responded and stated likewise. i understand all of us have distinctive critiques on issues, yet I do think of as accountable adults we would desire to continually subject ourselves with the protection of the extra youthful and vulnerable in society. If we don't, what does that say approximately us?
2016-10-22 11:32:17
·
answer #5
·
answered by shakita 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
I say the village should mind thier own business but be there for the parents when they ask for help.
2007-04-17 14:51:00
·
answer #6
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
It depends on the kid, really. :/
I know I didn't need two parents and a village to raise myself. Most of that I did on my own.
2007-04-17 14:40:26
·
answer #7
·
answered by dolmyyr 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
humans are social animals; everyone but sociopaths craves community.
kids need multiple positive influences, or they grow up with their parents' limitations. We should all want our kids to do better and better, not settle for what stokes our egos.
I dislike Hillary, but it does take a village (or a community of some kind).
2007-04-17 14:38:06
·
answer #8
·
answered by kent_shakespear 7
·
2⤊
1⤋
It takes a village if the parents are lazy
2007-04-17 14:35:06
·
answer #9
·
answered by Max 2
·
2⤊
1⤋
A village if you want a well-rounded child. If a narrow-minded child is your goal, then you want to limit his/her influence as some religious cults do.
2007-04-17 15:17:40
·
answer #10
·
answered by February Rain 4
·
0⤊
0⤋