Is there anybody who disapproves of the way the Virginia Tech President handled the situation?

Question

Why?

Answer 1

in hindsight, it is easy to disapprove of the way something was handled. at the time, it looked like something else-a domestic dispute. if you handled 100 domestic disputes and they all involved just the unhappy couple and/or family and close friends, you would not think the 101st would involve a guy running around on a shooting spree. most law enforcement procedures and profiling, unfortunately, are reactive. i mean, the last time any university i know of had a shooting spree like this was university of texas in i think 1961.

Answer 2

First permit me say that their are 15,000 scholars at that distinctive college, 4,000 interior the dorm, and 11,000 who stay off campus. Virginia Tech the former day had a Press convention on Fox information, and between the government (there have been 3), and that i do no longer understand his identify reported that they do have a secure practices equipment, by using digital mail, and different technical ability. even nevertheless the time that the incidents occurred, grew to become into interior the A.M. while the scholars have been commuting. while they did arrive they felt that it grew to become into suitable to fasten down while they did arrive. surely on the time of the information convention they have been nonetheless doing the learn of the witnesses, and that they did no longer have each and every of the solutions yet. That reported, i've got faith they might desire to have steel detectors as they do on the airports, and that i.D. playing cards (ones which will no longer be able to be counterfeited), as they're making plans to do with Passports contained in usa. Secondly while an incident does ensue they might desire to have a noisy siren like they do in Israel, and different international locations throughout the time of war time alerting human beings to pass into their shelters. That wll alert people who're commuting. For those that dorm they might desire to have a PA equipment put in. those are the only measures that i will think of of, apart from strickter gun administration regulations. actuality to tell, that's unlucky yet in spite of measures are put in it form of feels that once a deranged person, or a terrotist is desperate to break human beings regrettably they continually discover a thank you to paintings around any secure practices equipment it extremely is put in. that's form of a no win situation, yet we would desire to do what we would desire to do no count what. G-d might desire to help those households, to be waiting to triumph over the tragedy of dropping a chlld.

Answer 3

a shooting at a school no one knew where the gunman was or went....and they had one killed and one injured...why would you not cancel class? there was no good reason for not putting the school on lock down and finding out all the information before putting more students in danger....

the police and campus police should have completed sweeping the school grounds and made the school go to lock down

the campus president and staff...all the should have done is said would i want my child in that situtation? we all know the answer would be no..so if you would not expect your own child to attend school in this situtation cancel the dumb class...really they would only have lost that day and possibly saved 31 lives and maybe the 2 shooting would not have happened!

many comments keep stating that looking back yes it was wrong but they also state that police were working with limited information....so doesnt that hint that they should have known more and acted with not knowing where the gunman was? also....it is easy to look back and see mistakes !

Answer 4

I'm sure there are lots of people who disapprove. It's easy now to look at yesterday and see what was done wrong. At the time that decisions were made, it looked like treating the dorm shooting as an isolated incidence was correct. Many hours later, it looks like the shooter used that as a distraction to allow himself time to secure the building where the 2nd shooting took place.

I believe it is too easy to say what should have been done after the fact. At the time of the shootings, I think police and campus officials were working with limited knowledge that lead them to an unfortunately incorrect decision on how to proceed with the investigation. That's the problem with limited information, and I think it unfair to judge the VT president for making the choices he made.

Answer 5

The campus should have been shut down immediately. How long did it take for them to find out after the first shooting that he might have been a student? If they found out before the second shooting then you have to lock down immediately, he's a student and he has access and knows the campus !!!
When the Police responded they weren't sure where the shooter went. He could have been hiding on campus for all they know. Shut it down period !!!

Answer 6

He's been full of bureaurocratic, self-serving excuses.

They didn't even have a telephone tree (each official calls 3 people to spread word in an emergency) among the staff set up. Here is a leader who provided no leadership; he should just resign and hang his head in shame instead of defending himself.

Answer 7

all of the monday morning QB's have the benefit of hindsight.

they will question why it wasnt shut down or evacuated. if that is such a good plan then, lets shut down and evacuate any city of 25,000 people whenever there is a murderer on the loose. see how long that takes.

Answer 8

The benefit of hindsight is a wonderful thing.

Everyone handled it the best they could, with the information they had