Or was it the fault of Al "Global" Gore?
2007-04-17 11:46:43 · 16 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
Yes, didnt you know that during the shooters 2 hour intermission, President Bush arrived on the scene and told him who to shoot next.
2007-04-17 11:53:29 · answer #1 · answered by Katz 6 · 3⤊ 5⤋
No Andy. Not the new liberals, not the old liberals, not any liberals.
Bush isn't to blame for the Va. killings. America's screwed up society is to blame.
In America, people aren't people. They're things. They're resources. They are cogs in the machine... and that's all they are. If one falls away, another pops up to replace it.
America has an endless appetite for conflict and violence. America has become a monster, devouring it's own... and everyone else's. It needs death, destruction and despair the way that a junkie needs heroin.
Too long without it... and you can hear the whole country moan and retch. America is most alive while it's cutting its own wrists.
2007-04-17 12:11:12 · answer #2 · answered by Anonymous · 6⤊ 0⤋
I don't think there is such a thing as a "neo-Liberal"...either your liberal or not. I am fairly liberal and i don't think it's anyone's fault necessarily...but I think it should be harder to get a weapon that is made especially to kill people...I'm not saying outlaw them, just increase the penalty for selling black market guns and make it harder to get a carry permit. I have guns and I want to keep them...it is a right to have them, but having a psychological test to determine if you are capable of being responsible and not go on a rampage would be a good idea
2007-04-17 11:57:26 · answer #3 · answered by Ford Prefect 7 · 5⤊ 1⤋
Bush already admitted not signing the automatic weapons ban Bill Clinton legislated while he was President. Didn't you hear his speech today? If Bush hadn't done this with one of his 800 signing statements 33 wouldn't be dead today. It allowed a South Korean to purchase 2 automatic weapons with a green card within a two month period. The Automatic Glocks carried a 15 round clip too, which was banned by Clinton's legislature. Green card carriers wouldn't be allowed to purchase weapons like Al Queada at Wal Mart..
2007-04-17 11:56:49 · answer #4 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Were the United States a country that actually supported the right to life guns would be almost impossible for a civilian to obtain. To that degree the White House and Congress are responsible for not restricting access to modern weapons.
George the Second shares the responsibility with every NRA member and every weak spirited legislator of both parties who fears the gun lobby.
2007-04-17 11:52:59 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 2⤋
Bush
2007-04-17 11:50:01 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 2⤋
How about the fault of a madman!! The government is not responsible for this an any way shape or form.
The Gunman was a legal resident not a citizen!! So he could not have obtained any of the weapons legally!!
2007-04-17 11:54:23 · answer #7 · answered by wondermom 6 · 2⤊ 3⤋
I already read a question this morning where someone said that Bush has blood on his hands regarding the shootings. (He blamed Congress too.) It is stupid. Bush had nothing to do with it. The only one at fault is a 23 year old English major from South Korea.
2007-04-17 11:52:53 · answer #8 · answered by JessicaRabbit 6 · 1⤊ 5⤋
I prayed for the victims and their families. On days like yesterday we're all Americans.
2007-04-17 12:00:03 · answer #9 · answered by wyldfyr 7 · 3⤊ 0⤋
Neo-Liberals?
2007-04-17 11:50:07 · answer #10 · answered by ck4829 7 · 2⤊ 5⤋