Fair point. I bet people made fun of this kid all the time... any perosn subject to that constant ridicule and likely racism would be expected to fight back eventually.
2007-04-18 00:45:48
·
answer #1
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
yeah, im so sure that 32 people all had a reason to die and that this guy was the one who should have done it. How can you think that? the only reason he should be able to explain is if he was framed and i severely doubt that. Next are you going to say that maybe everyone in the world trade center might have deserved to die? Whats wrong with you. Oh, and one last thing, 33 people WEREN'T innocent. one of them was the shooter. 32 people were innocent.
2007-04-17 16:38:08
·
answer #2
·
answered by nerodx16 2
·
0⤊
1⤋
It is so comforting to see someone else not falling for the mob mentality. This is still America, where people are inncoentuntil proven guilty, and, even then, who can really trust the judicial system when they go on a witch hunt? Who can really say for sure that Bush didn't set this poor kid up, to be a distraction from Iraq?
2007-04-18 07:37:56
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Considering personal accounts, some of them did not even know him and others already knew he had a sick personality from his writings. These people were totally innocent, it was he that pulled the trigger and murdered 33 people. This was a one side event and nothing could justify his action.
2007-04-17 16:29:08
·
answer #4
·
answered by trigunmarksman 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
Why are you defending a killer? Even if they weren't "perfectly innocent" they didn't deserve to die. Are you saying that if someone says or does something to you that you don't like you kill them? Do you think it's ok to kill your bf just because he was with another girl? I'm sure you aren't perfect, do you deserve to be killed? No one does, that's not how human beings act. It's people like you who obviously think killing is ok who make our world a bad place.
2007-04-17 16:36:14
·
answer #5
·
answered by Kittieashy 4
·
1⤊
1⤋
He (the shooter) might have been a lot of things, but innocent right now isn't and wasn't one of them, all of the others that he brought into his dilemma, were innocent, unknowing and unwilling participants.
2007-04-17 16:30:53
·
answer #6
·
answered by Bethy4 6
·
2⤊
0⤋
He had a chance to air his grievances. He was referred to counseling by at least one of the instructors or professors. Whether he went or not is unknown.
Now crawl back under your bridge like a good troll.
2007-04-17 16:29:14
·
answer #7
·
answered by Ralfcoder 7
·
1⤊
0⤋
Here's an idea. Weigh all of the shooting victims and then weigh the shooter. Which weighs more? No fair counting the weight of the guns or the ammunition. Okay. Did you learn anything?
2007-04-17 16:32:19
·
answer #8
·
answered by charliecizarny 5
·
0⤊
1⤋
Even if these students weren't "perfectly innocent" it does not give anyone the right to take their life.
2007-04-17 16:28:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by mhireangel 4
·
2⤊
1⤋
You make a valid point, however he lost his right to tell his side of the story when he shot himself in the face.
2007-04-17 16:40:43
·
answer #10
·
answered by Gyasi M 4
·
0⤊
1⤋