English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

If guns kill people then...

- pencils mis spel words.
- cars make people drive drunk.
- spoons made Rosie O'Donnell fat.

2007-04-17 09:13:41 · 28 answers · asked by Whootziedude 4 in Politics & Government Politics

In case any one is still monitoring - I find the excuse of being mentally ill to be a shallow one. i work with such a poplulation, and I can tell you that mentally ill and evil are not mutually exclusive. That's not to say they are synonomous, you can be mentally ill and not be evil. But to me, evil is evil, regardless of one's mental condition. This was pure evil in my book.

2007-04-17 10:18:48 · update #1

In case any one is still monitoring - I find the excuse of being mentally ill to be a shallow one. i work with such a poplulation, and I can tell you that mentally ill and evil are not mutually exclusive. That's not to say they are synonomous, you can be mentally ill and not be evil. But to me, evil is evil, regardless of one's mental condition. This was pure evil in my book.

2007-04-17 10:18:53 · update #2

Okay, how'd my additional detail get up there twice. Maybe I'm mentally ill and just keep repeating the same thing over and over again.

2007-04-17 10:22:07 · update #3

28 answers

well said and the comment about Rosie O'Donnell is really funny =). i think gun control will not at all stop the problem of evil people and i asked a question with the same topic as yours. it puzzles me that people that want to ban guns don't consider- or they just ignore- the fact that criminals will be criminals and get guns illegally. if you are going to go against the law and shoot people, especially innocent ones, you will obviously go againt the law to get a gun. if we can't fight the actions of the bad people that kill like the merciless man at Virginia Tech, we must defend against them with guns. had the law stated that you could carry a weapon if its concealed, they couldve stopped the shoopting right there by killing the man and sparing many lives.

2007-04-17 12:25:11 · answer #1 · answered by Ava 3 · 1 0

No, gun control won't solve the problem of 'evil' people ... nor will it give help to those who are 'mentally challenged' by a 'psychological problem' ... and I love your 'equal statements' because they are 'equally silly' ...

I assume your question came today because of the 'killings' at Virginia Tech yesterday ... so I have one 'little' correction I'd like to make ... I don't think that the killer was EVIL ... I think that he was 'terribly mentally ill' to the point that people noticed it and he even got 'some help' for his problems ... but because this world still thinks that a 'mental health problem' can 'totally damage your life' many people don't get the 'good help' that they need fast enough to be any 'help' at all ... and I 'thought this' even BEFORE today's news about the 'identity' of the killer and the 'statements' by teachers and others that he was 'weird' and possibly mentally ill. THINK ABOUT IT.

2007-04-17 09:40:37 · answer #2 · answered by Kris L 7 · 2 1

There is plenty of speak approximately whether or not or now not we want extra gun manage. My individual opinion apart, I was once considering how this would be truthfully confirmed, a method or an additional. What got here to brain was once to discover an additional motive of loss of life (now not adding scientific stipulations) with equivalent numbers. My information comes from 2004, which was once the ultra-modern yr I would discover facts. The quantity of folks within the U.S. killed via different folks (this doesn't comprise suicides) with weapons in 2004 was once 12,273. The closest quantity to that I would discover was once 12,874. This was once the quantity of deaths brought on via under the influence of alcohol drivers. So, 12,273 folks had been killed via weapons, and 12,874 had been killed via alcohol. That appears to be sensible ample. Now there are very strict legislation related to under the influence of alcohol using. In the final 25 years the have got steadily stricter. The authorized age to shop for has long gone as much as 21 in all states, while within the early eighty's there have been nonetheless states wherein 18 and 19 was once authorized. The authorized blood alcohol content material has been diminished to .08% in each state, that used to vary from state to state as good. Did I mentiom under the influence of alcohol using is unlawful in all 50 states? Well, it's. My factor? Well, despite the fact that new legislation had been handed and ancient legislation had been tightened up, under the influence of alcohol using nonetheless kills extra folks that weapons do. The legislation can have cut back on deaths, however the finish outcome are nonetheless now not very well. The variations listed below are transparent. Alcohol is not just permitted however influenced in todays society. Look at how so much The tv media pushes it. You cannot watch a physical games occasion with out being flooded with beer advertisements. When was once the final time you noticed a gun advert on TV? Gun manage is more often than not an obstacle for the duration of election time, under the influence of alcohol using is seldom, if ever, acknowledged in any respect. A under the influence of alcohol driving force killing a loved ones would seize a bit press within the newspapers, possibly even a pair mins on TV, but when that equal loved ones is killed via a gunman you'll guess you'll pay attention approximately it for no less than a pair days. So what's it you gun manage advocates are particularly after? Is it obstacle for lifestyles? Why is it then, whenever a under the influence of alcohol driving force slams right into a mini van, killing a loved ones of 4, you are not out in drive worrying extra history assessments earlier than you'll purchase booze? Why is it then, every time a carful of under the influence of alcohol teens rolls over, killing all within, you are not available in the market at the airwaves worrying that beer be bought in not more than four packs. Why then, every time a father of 4 and loving husband will get under the influence of alcohol and wraps his automobile round a tree leaving his loved ones with not anything, you are not available in the market worrying that a man or woman can handiest purchase one six percent a month? Well, it's visible it's not obstacle for lives you're involved approximately. So what's it? Do you even recognise, or are you simply following the gang?

2016-09-05 15:44:34 · answer #3 · answered by suzie 4 · 0 0

Gun control laws will never stop evil people from doing evil things.

Take away guns....they will move on to the next weapon...knife, baseball bat, hatchet, etc., etc.

Personal responsibility is the key here.

Evil, demented people kill innocent people.....not guns, knives, baseball bats, hatchet...etc!

Mentally ill and evil shoud be recognized for what they are individually....I don't think my 97 year old grandmother with dimentia is evil....do you?

2007-04-17 10:57:28 · answer #4 · answered by Nibbles 5 · 3 0

Interesting argument, I would have to say no. But it would help.
Guns are tools of killing, and how easy it is to get one is unnaccepetable. Guns don't cause the killing, but they make it easier.

It's funny how I can be sitting there, listening to a man complain how the liberals are trying to take his guns away, and at the same time be hearing about the Virginia Tech shooting.
Gun control can't stop a man hellbent on killing, but it might stop someone else.

2007-04-17 09:27:50 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 2 1

Only a liberal could be so enlightened that it would make sense to take away the rights of everyone because of the acts of a mentally deranged person.

At least the cons want to take away rights due to the convictions of a group of people and not the isolated acts of lunatics.

2007-04-17 09:29:11 · answer #6 · answered by C B 6 · 6 1

And all those guns the terrorists attacked our country with on 9/11.

Oops, I almost forgot. There were no guns. So, no more planes, no more box cutters, no more fuel. I think we just solved all the problems in the world.

2007-04-17 09:33:09 · answer #7 · answered by TRUE PATRIOT 6 · 5 1

I really like your analogies. Gun control laws would not solve anything and this is why. If a criminal really wants a gun, they won't hesitate to turn to criminal methods to get one. When this happens the criminals still get the guns but the average law-abiding citizen is left defenseless.

2007-04-17 09:28:27 · answer #8 · answered by asylum31 6 · 6 1

Yes it will help theNWO gain another victory over the people.
Didn't AlbGon luck out today.

2007-04-17 09:24:53 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 0 0

Of course not

Gun control laws exacerbate the problem of evil people

2007-04-17 09:23:11 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 4 1

fedest.com, questions and answers