if he wasnt on the bulls where would u think he would be? would u think chicago would still be a championship contender w/o him?
2007-04-17 09:06:48 · 11 answers · asked by Adrian 2 in Sports ➔ Basketball
EITHER WAY, THEY HAVE A GOOD TEAM.
2007-04-24 06:41:21 · answer #1 · answered by smitty 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Ben Gordon went 3rd in 2004. The Clippers had the 4th pick and selected Shawn Livingson and the Wizards the 5th pick with Devin Harris. Due to trades and whatever else who knows where Ben Gordon would be if the Bulls had not selected him.
Depending who you would have to fill Gordon shoes would be a factor if the Bulls would be Championship contenders. The Bulls defense makes them a good team. Gordon averaged 21 points per game this season and he can produce his own offense and he is aggressive. Along with Deng that produces more problems for Defenses. All I can say the Bulls without Ben Gordon, well those 21 points per game would have to come from somewhere. Chicago needs his offense.
2007-04-25 10:55:53 · answer #2 · answered by katdaddy0013 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
I think the Bulls are a better TEAM without Ben Gordon. While Ben is a clutch shooter, he's not the best team player. We'll see how it works out for the Bulls in the playoffs this year.
2007-04-22 14:36:47 · answer #3 · answered by phil_cheesy 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
The bulls would suck without Ben Gordon. He may not be consistent but he's high on my list to have the ball in his hands at the end of game. This kid just pulls it out everytime.
2007-04-17 16:43:53 · answer #4 · answered by guero 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
they arent a championship contending team. the filled a spot in the weak east division. but they definately would not be as good as they are today without him. they would actually be fighting for a playoff spot right now, instead of sitting comfy in the top 5. but like i said, they're ina easy division, and definately not guna win the championship. even if they made it to the finals, which they do have a chance at doing, they would get mauled by whichever team from the west. absolutely torn apart.
2007-04-17 16:19:02 · answer #5 · answered by jason 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
no. they need Ben Gordon. He's one of the main reasons why the Bulls are where they are. Later.
2007-04-24 16:43:38 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
DID YOU KNOW HE was BORN IN ENGLAND??...anyways the bulls would not be as good as they are now. they still have lual deng [who cant do everything] and kirk hinrich...ben wallace. ben gordon is a lil sloppy but he's good for the bulls and is it true that
tyrus thomas [from bulls] can be traded to the knicks next year?
2007-04-17 17:39:34 · answer #7 · answered by apple 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋
yes. the bulls have always made it to the playofffs. even before the 3-peats of the 90's. it's in their fate to make the first round of the playoffs. it's just they never (except during their 3-peat reign during the 90s) make it past the first round... sad.
2007-04-23 16:36:29 · answer #8 · answered by mys_tnt 2 · 0⤊ 1⤋
If the Bulls didn't have ben then they would have luol deng!
2007-04-17 16:11:41 · answer #9 · answered by Mr.Triple-Crown 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
No...he is the quote star player eventhough they don't consider him a Star.
2007-04-17 16:17:51 · answer #10 · answered by J Dub 5 · 0⤊ 0⤋