that george w. bush was able to GET over to Virginia very swiftly after the attack at Virginia Tech, THE VERY NEXT day...but when hurricane Katrina hit Louisiana and parts of Mississippi and other coastal areas...he did NOT appear for two entire weeks!.....im outraged at his performance as a leader of the United States of America...what are YOUR opinions on this?
2007-04-17 08:12:24 · 23 answers · asked by wolvie 6 in Entertainment & Music ➔ Polls & Surveys
i see some of you all are ignorant AND OBLIVIOUS TO THE WORLD AROUND U.....ITS SAD..
2007-04-17 08:19:57 · update #1
it really doesnt matter how far away any place is, this is ALL america...and hes suppose to serve and protect HIS ppl right? but he is only focusing on the ones he FEELS is important...ppl...WATCH THE MOVIE "WHEN THE LEVEES BROKE....."
2007-04-17 08:21:37 · update #2
and so what if new orleans was submerged ppl??? bush has planes! boats! TROOPS (unfortunately)! HE could have easily flown over this area with his own PLANE and looked for survivors...but he chose to not do anything...i agree with kanye west about what he said about bush.....
2007-04-17 08:33:11 · update #3
Its disgusting, your president was critised here for his delay to response to Katrina, he has the responsibility to respond to his people immediately whether they voted for him or not.
He has our prime ministers head up his @ss & dragged us into the war, so i feel i can comment.
2007-04-17 08:20:49 · answer #1 · answered by riverdanceboi 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
well it was sad the way Katrina was handled by not only bush but maybe some of the other emergency response groups that would have responded to a foreign diaster quicker.
Given our ongoing woes in Iraq it would seem that America is in dire need of a new administration.Our hands are tied till the election.Hopefully we will elect an administration that will better our current domestic and foreign policies.
Looks like were stuck with the powers that be..
2007-04-17 15:35:15 · answer #2 · answered by heartbeat 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Well, Virginia is on the border of DC, is it not? Just wondering if you ever considered that. Hate W, but don't think that he would have gotten away with it for more than a day without people on the white house lawn.
2007-04-17 15:15:59 · answer #3 · answered by Kris B 5 · 3⤊ 1⤋
Right!! Not only did he get there swifty,he also got the govenor from Virginia that was visiting hong kong I think it was..not sure..dont quote me..he got him there very quickly also..like the next day quick.
2007-04-17 15:18:09 · answer #4 · answered by breeze279755 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
we need to hope we can last another year and a half hes lost his damn mind but dont compare the 2 events both tragic ? yes. both horriffic? yes. one was forseen and warning issued the other was suppose to be in a safe zone and were not warned of anything.
2007-04-17 15:17:57 · answer #5 · answered by jack 4 · 1⤊ 0⤋
I agree with you he should of gone to Louisiana like he did, yesterday, but that is the least on my mind, my sorrels is with all those people who lost their love ones and friends. Louisiana will always be there and will come back to life, but the people that were killed will not.
2007-04-17 15:17:37 · answer #6 · answered by misty blue 6 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Blacksburg, Virginia is comparatively close to DC, and New Orleans was under water.
2007-04-17 15:16:02 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 5⤊ 1⤋
well for one thing the roads and airports were flooded wasnt easy to travel to katrina but in virginia there wasnt anything to stop him so dont pull the race card
2007-04-17 15:16:17 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 4⤊ 1⤋
bush blows n im not even from the states. but u guys elected him. TWICE hahah idiots
2007-04-17 15:17:36 · answer #9 · answered by muzit 5 · 1⤊ 0⤋
Worth making a note of. If anybody says ' coincidence ' they deserve to be barfed on.
2007-04-17 15:17:38 · answer #10 · answered by vanamont7 7 · 2⤊ 1⤋