Where will historians rank George W. Bush among the Presidents?

Question

Personally, I think that he will be at the very bottom - he may unseat Buchanan as the perennial worst ever.

Answer 1

It'll float around the bottom before it finally settles into dead last.

Answer 2

Buchanan is credited with starting the American Civil War and thus is granted the dubious title, Worst US President. But George Bush is skating on very thin ice to capture the title.

Answer 3

The History Channel already conducted a survey of 400 historians who ranked Bush OVERWHELMINGLY the worst.

Answer 4

Dictator Dumbya does NOT merit ranking among presidents since he was NEVER elected, but if you ask me what I think of the installation on the day of the 1-20-01 Tragedy... you get the idea. "Worst" would be undeserved high praise, as history will show.

Answer 5

All of your presidents were bellends. Just the same as all the British Prime ministers were bellends with the exception of Churchill of course. He had some balls at least and didn't go around starting wars just defended his nation.

Answer 6

Historians have been weighing in on George Bush, and the news isn't good. I think most people already know he will go down in history as an example of how not to run a war and how to divide a country. He even admitted in a Time article that he knew "short-term" historians wouldn't give him good marks. I guess he's hoping a hundred years from now they'll be less educated and give him a pass. Here's a study on the historians and George Bush:

http://hnn.us/articles/5019.html

"I don't expect many short-term historians to write nice things about me." - George W. Bush

http://www.time.com/time/personoftheyear/2004/story.html

Answer 7

In the History Books:

George W. Bush: First Fraudulent American President.

Answer 8

George W. Bush will not be written in history as a great president, he will be written in history as a great American mistake and a black mark in our past.
May he stay at the ranch and quietly finish his last two years.

Answer 9

It really depends on who succeeds him as the next president. He had to spend his first term cleaning up the mess CLinton left behind on many levels, much less dealiing with the warcry from the middleast terrorist thugs that you libs conveniently try to forget.

He's done some good things and made mistakes, like every other president. But I believe history will show him to be somewhere in the middle.

But then again you libs are the open-minded tolerant ones, so you know better than the rest of us. I know one thing: He'll rank much higher than clinton and carter, who are officially tied for the worst people/"presidents" in our nations history.

Answer 10

Depends who will be next. I think, that Bush II ranks with Reagan, Nixon and Bush I in the murky depths of totally inapt leaders, whom the majority of the public identified with, such voting for them.

Answer 11

Asked again when the bill comes due for his war, I bet the boy king will rated on the bottom rung.