Oh please. The fault lies with the nut-job that did the shooting.
2007-04-17 07:03:07
·
answer #1
·
answered by surffsav 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
I dont think he should be blamed for what happened but he could of handled it a lot better, because after the first shooting the students should of been told about it immediately not two hours later when they were either already on campus or on their way when the student were finally warned about what happened at 7:15 the gunman was already their on the campus killing all of them innocent people and the President. of the school cant even explain why it took them two hours to warn the students about what happened. If he would of tried to warn the students immediately after the first shooting a lot of the peoples lives could of been spared
2007-04-17 05:55:35
·
answer #2
·
answered by Rae 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
Anyone who blames him or anyone else besides the KILLER is a fool! I really think anyone who thinks that should go and be put in that position and let the rest of us grade you on how you do! Some things just happen in life people and I for one believe that law enforcemnet did what it could without causing a panic or getting alot more killed! There is always a Monday morning QB out there sittin in front of his Tv thinkin he or she could have done a better job! If ya can then why aren't YOU out there doin it!
2007-04-17 05:55:29
·
answer #3
·
answered by concerned Illinois 2
·
1⤊
0⤋
i dont think he should be. im a virginia tech alum and im amazed at the huge number of monday morning quarterbacks that have popped up. hind sight is 20/20 people. of course, looking back we can see things that should have been done better but Tech wasnt the one that committed the murders. laying blame at this point one anyone but the shooter himself is not gonna help anything. we need to properly grieve and learn from what happened yesterday
2007-04-17 05:49:34
·
answer #4
·
answered by rob 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
I don't. I live in christiansburg, which is 5 minutes from Va Tech campus. I have lived in this area my whole life and how comfortable we all are when it comes to these types of things. This just doesn't happen here. We hear about tragicevents like this and always think we are safe. I don't htink he could have imagined in his deepest fears that something like this could ever happen here.
2007-04-17 05:47:49
·
answer #5
·
answered by browneyedgirl 2
·
0⤊
0⤋
You had me with the "blame" question yet then lost me once you went directly to place out the excuses why liberals would desire to be blamed. the guy became right into a mentally unwell nut job. in spite of if he became into "liberal" or "conservative" would not surely matter plenty, the guy became into looney tunes. Why can we would desire to lay blame in any respect, different than basically seeing it for what it became into? do no longer attempt to tell me that no conservatives have psychological ailments, it exists in all walks of existence. i detect it disconcerting that the two sides of the political perspective want accountable somebody, anybody. however the reality that the entire quantity of his ailment wasn't known and acted upon via psychological wellbeing experts seems to in ordinary terms get a byline.
2016-10-22 10:25:28
·
answer #6
·
answered by ? 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
It's not about somebody knowing it's about it being controlled and people being made aware. How would you like to be in class and not knowing that there is a shooting going on in the gym?
2007-04-17 05:47:18
·
answer #7
·
answered by Khalil 3
·
1⤊
0⤋
No one could that, this would happen.
The critics need to take a dose of "Getoveritol"!
Tragic as its is--the "shooter" is the only one to blame.
2007-04-17 05:49:00
·
answer #8
·
answered by FunkyMcNasty 3
·
0⤊
0⤋
Oh my god, YES.
He should be the only one responsible.
How the H*** can a f****** person not inform thousands of people that their lives are in danger for over two hours!
2007-04-17 05:47:49
·
answer #9
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
1⤋
I don't think so.
No one should be blamed but the psychotic killer.
2007-04-17 05:49:58
·
answer #10
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋