Do you think the shooters motive was to attack the united states or some other reason?
2007-04-17 04:43:03 · 21 answers · asked by Anonymous in Politics & Government ➔ Politics
like many other shootings i believe he was lonely ans was picked on and made fun of by other students if you read the police report it said that he was a loner and a social outcast not going to any parties or having many or any friends
i think that he might feel better by ending his lifes misury by killing himself but by killing others someone cared
2007-04-17 04:49:26 · answer #1 · answered by me 2 · 1⤊ 0⤋
No one knows for sure, yet, but I don't think so. I think the Asian man was a drug addict, flipped out, or else he may have had medicals problems, on drugs, and flipped out.
You know what ticks me off though? Where are the white people complaining about the false accusation to the police to be on the look out for a white man driving a black truck, instead, of the truth, that an Asian man was shooting people at VA. Tech? Where is the outrage? This false statement came from a person at the school, calling into the police, hence the 2 hour delay, on getting the MF! When a black person, or other race is falsely accused, you're going to HEAR about it! I would like to know why white people don't get angry, when they are falsely accused? More people died because some idiot gave the cops a false lead. They suck.
2007-04-17 04:54:57 · answer #2 · answered by xenypoo 7 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Possible but it is a pity the attacker is no more to find out the motive behind the attack! In any case, no one can and should jump into any conclusions while investigations are in progress!
2007-04-17 04:48:02 · answer #3 · answered by Sami V 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
You don't have to attack a nation for it to be terrorism. The VT shootings were an act of terrorism. Just take a look around you at the fear and outrage this tragic incident has sparked.
2007-04-17 04:47:42 · answer #4 · answered by smedrik 7 · 1⤊ 1⤋
Of course it was a terrorist attack.
Did the attack incite Terror all across the country?
The motives behind it do not define it as a terror attack. Its the results of the attack.
2007-04-17 04:46:46 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 1⤋
http://answers.yahoo.com/question/index;_ylt=AhtlS34EpbDGGEd61I8J8xDsy6IX?qid=20070417072133AAwKzQc
I don't believe it was meant as an act of terrorism per se. I believe the young man was trying to restore balance. Instead of going for wrath to correct the problem which was out of balance to begin with in this triangle where the common denominator was love. he maybe should have Y'd his approach beginning with the common denominator first 3 different ways respectively in order to restore balance. i wouldn't be scared by what he did. I think he was just trying to achieve balance.
2007-04-17 04:47:28 · answer #6 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
do no longer you propose what share months after Clinton became into presented Bin Lauden and became it down have been we attacked in New Your, and Washington? The wars have been already occurring while Obama took workplace if it surpassed off now he might do no longer something.
2016-10-22 10:18:30 · answer #7 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
1) No, this wasn't a terrorist attack. Terrorism is basically the use of violence to affect peoples' behavior and patterns. This was just random killing for no real reason.
2) No, he was just a whacko.
2007-04-17 04:47:08 · answer #8 · answered by Anonymous · 3⤊ 1⤋
any time you have an act of violence and fear, it is a terrorist attack. who knows what the shooters motive was. he is dead.
2007-04-17 04:46:38 · answer #9 · answered by truth seeker 7 · 1⤊ 0⤋
He was upset with his girlfriend. I don't think a terrorist would have a girlfriend at VT.... but then, stranger things have happened.
2007-04-17 04:47:37 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 1⤋