2007-04-17 04:31:22 · 20 answers · asked by Anonymous in News & Events ➔ Other - News & Events
Hey,hey,hey, no explitives here EURO.. It was just a question. And in answer to your question then what do you call 9/11? That was a terrorist attack.. No bombs there, just planes.
2007-04-17 04:53:42 · update #1
NO. It is part of the much more common "Nutcase Attack."
However it does show how ill-prepared we are if there was a real terrorist attack
2007-04-17 04:35:26 · answer #1 · answered by Rich Z 7 · 2⤊ 0⤋
Cho wasn't a terrorist, yet a loner wacko. that is actual in spite of what faith he became into. i think of that in spite of if he HAD stated on a tape that he became into doing it for Islam, the universal public might nevertheless see it as a psychological wellbeing concern particularly than a terrorist attack. there's a particularly comparable case being tried now in Seattle ... a pair of years in the past, Navid Haq (a Muslim) shot up a Jewish community center, killing one lady and wounding 5 others. As with Cho, the underlying concern in the back of Haq's attack seems to be psychological wellbeing particularly than faith or terrorism.
2016-10-22 10:17:30 · answer #2 · answered by ? 4 · 0⤊ 0⤋
My definition of terrorism is coercive criminal behavior which supports a substantially unpopular or untenable position, or provides oblique support for justice issues that are by this chosen means ineffective, particularly targeting people who are not relevant to the issue.
The motive is not known or has not been revealed. Asians are worried that there may be a backlash and White Americans are relieved it was not a white American this time.
2007-04-17 04:55:10 · answer #3 · answered by Ron H 6 · 1⤊ 0⤋
A terrorist is a person who terrorizes or frightens others.
Terror is an instance or cause of intense fear or anxiety; quality of causing terror.
Fear and anxiety present. It is a terrorist attack.
Terrorism is a term used to describe violence or other harmful acts committed (or threatened) against civilians by groups or persons for political or ideological goals (fear in latin). Most definitions of terrorism include only those acts which are intended to create fear or "terror", are perpetrated for an ideological goal (as opposed to a "madman" attack), and deliberately target "non-combatants".
Unknown political or ideological goals, so its sub-catogorization is madman.
2007-04-17 04:54:17 · answer #4 · answered by methosyhlim 2 · 0⤊ 0⤋
Imagine if he had been Iranian, whoa the hysteria then, American Government, always looks to blame rather than accept it own problems
There are NO Terrorists that we havent made ourselves
Why are they ALWAYS described as 'a quiet loner'?
2007-04-17 05:18:56 · answer #5 · answered by Anonymous · 0⤊ 0⤋
Hmmmm Bush said, "If you are not for us, then you are against us!"
I am assuming that this means any time someone goes up against the ideals and laws of the United States / Bush administration then you are indeed a "terrorist."
2007-04-17 04:41:40 · answer #6 · answered by NONAME 4 · 3⤊ 0⤋
It doesn't have to be Muslims, as long as a psycho attacks innocent people than that is a terrorist attack.
2007-04-17 04:37:53 · answer #7 · answered by carlos r 2 · 2⤊ 0⤋
I don't think they have disclosed the motive as of yet. They are still researching and trying to interview people. Since he was a loner is hard to find information about him.
2007-04-17 05:19:15 · answer #8 · answered by Princesa 3 · 0⤊ 0⤋
American Idiot!!, No starting wars and dropping bombs on people from 15,000 meters is a terrorist attack, what this person did was obey the laws of your constitution and buy a gun at Walmarts or Kmarts, those bastions of fine shopping and he got pissed off at something and just do what people do in america when they get angry, they kill or maim people
2007-04-17 04:37:32 · answer #9 · answered by Anonymous · 2⤊ 3⤋
Maybe we should invade/attack South Korea.
2007-04-17 04:35:06 · answer #10 · answered by Anonymous · 1⤊ 0⤋