English Deutsch Français Italiano Español Português 繁體中文 Bahasa Indonesia Tiếng Việt ภาษาไทย
All categories

have a chance or who are get winner

2007-04-17 02:33:49 · 12 answers · asked by fernando h 1 in Sports Cricket

12 answers

You've risen a question of ,maximum interrest.
Most "pundits"
hypocrite enogh NOT to rise this kind of Question..
without # most influential players Lankans shown good attacking crickrt to Oz .3 wickets gone
sanga & Sanath lbw all crap billy doctrove windies umpire is not suitable to cup finals he is sort of scared to Big Bully OZ players...

Regarding 2007 cricket world cup.
They are in a good shape.They have flair & talent.
S>L> have most varied bowling attack in this cup
new zealand so called favourites found out how strong lankans are .
Now most immportantly they hanve rekindled their ability to win in alien ,overseas conditions.
( such as Carribean conditions)
They proved that in Guyana's newest stadium..
And Granada too...
the hurdle started when they topple high riding Indians.
They defeated star studded Indian team with clinical aproach.
South Africans escaaped unscathed by desimal points.
it was lucky for African part.
As Mahela puts..........."It's time to be ruthless".
Can you remember,..It was supposed to ...be Indian's, world cup this time.
Sachin being senior most he should have waited until right moment comes.
But these blokes from "Sri Lanka" had other ideas.
Furthermore it was 250 runs to get....
Lankans got it by running between wickets.
They have come of age now.
they are cunning as foxes now.
in1996 cup they had this kind of team.

Australian dominance may decline in near fure in front of these fighting Sri Lankans....Nobody knows..
We have solid facts for that....
SL has upper hand...for future games..
Its all the way for Asian Teams
No more 'Old-English-gentelmen' ruling the Cricket World.
But see how they became top of the world right now...
Though they beat india They still had to give their best ever performance..
They almost won with South Africa.,by Malinga heroics.
Now It's Sri Lanka's time to be Called As,...
"Star- studded Cricket team of World cup -2007"
Their.. ballers and fielders taught how to win when you ,balling second time.
When Robin Uthappa and Sourav Ganguly walked in, India had a target of just 255 runs, on a wicket which had dried and gone flatter.
But nobody showed the charactor to stay on,
Anybody can be so sure that ,the turning point was Sachin’s getting out to Big-Fernando, through the gate for a duck.
.Like wise when Vass on full flaw any thing can happen.
History may repeat this time like 1996.
Whatever little chances India had went up in flames ...
when Yuvraj was run out by Lankans.
They made presure on much favoured Indians.
Next,New Zealand & England had felt the presure.

It is really worth analysing the difference among the teams.
. India’s strength was batting and given the proper conditions, their medium pacers and the spinners could be devastating.
If not, Indian's shoulders start drooping and the bowling goes haywire with all kind of experimentations. It could happen to the batting too.

Exactly opposite are Sri Lanka, except that their batting is as good if not better. Other big teams were the big brothers when they started. Now Lankans are the elders.
What an irony. They are better fielders for sure, and the bowlers bowl to the field under any circumstances unless it’s a completely off day for them.

Muralitharan,Vass,Malinga & Dilhara.. is just outstanding. And most importantly, they play as a team and not as individuals.
And that’s the thin line that differentiated the two teams. We saw absolutely no regional biases, despite all kinds of problems in their small country.
They had civil war,& Tsunami.
But still they rise like legendery phinix bird.
So wait,fans more fire works yet to come...
They now have to beat only 3 teams to advance easyly to much awaited semi finals.

My unbias Verdict is Lankans Have 90 percent chance to grab the CUP.
Cuz,... 1996 they hadthis knd of a amazing team..
1996 they had this uncanny luck too.
they are the worthy winners..
Long live CRicket..

2007-04-17 02:41:51 · answer #1 · answered by Anonymous · 1 1

World Team Rankings 1 Australia 130 2 South Africa 127 3 Pakistan 112 4 Sri Lanka 110 5 India 107 6 New Zealand 107 7 England 106 8 West Indies 101 9 Bangladesh 42 10 Zimbabwe 22 11 Kenya 0 chances of sri lanka

2016-05-17 07:46:15 · answer #2 · answered by ? 3 · 0 0

Kudoos to Sri Lanka for their game so far. but winning the World Cup it is difficult for them against Australia, who Rules the Game. Anyway I wish the Sri Lankan the Very Best.

2007-04-19 16:28:56 · answer #3 · answered by satishfreeman 5 · 0 0

Though Sri Lanka have been playing well, I do not think that they will be able to life the world cup.

2007-04-17 06:32:44 · answer #4 · answered by vakayil k 7 · 0 0

May Srilanka win the world cup but The strongest contender for this world cup 2007 is Australia.

2007-04-18 23:32:36 · answer #5 · answered by fairy 6 · 0 0

It will be Sri Lanka or Australia

2007-04-17 12:20:24 · answer #6 · answered by Sl Lion 2 · 0 0

After 1996 this is the the best team they have produced to world cup cricket.
in that sence they have a chance
most probably

2007-04-17 03:28:35 · answer #7 · answered by Anonymous · 1 0

r u kidding sri lanka is going to put of a good fight for that cup since they played australia already i think it is going to be hard for them to bet them again.

2007-04-17 11:50:06 · answer #8 · answered by rnkf_02 2 · 0 0

The way the Lions are battling.
I do not think that Aussies or any other team will have a chance.
With their powerfull bowling & Batiing attack & with a fantastic fielding side.
::

2007-04-18 20:29:49 · answer #9 · answered by Dilantha2 3 · 0 0

this time new zealand or aussies will lift the cup

2007-04-17 02:54:35 · answer #10 · answered by Vishnu_the_lunatiq 2 · 0 0

fedest.com, questions and answers