Freddie Murcury! I watch a show about the best rock singers of all time and I think Freddie was one of the top three...if not number 1.
2007-04-17 01:52:43
·
answer #1
·
answered by Kraziegurl79 ist ein Rock Star 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
Freddie Mercury
2007-04-17 08:52:55
·
answer #2
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
I'm partial to Paul Rogers because I'm more of a Bad Co. and Free fan...Rogers vocals on "We Are the Champions" certainly did not disappoint me; however, I was a bit reluctant to go along with the whole Paul Rogers/Queen thing at first, I'm glad that it did work out for him....Mercury rocks though! don't get me wrong.
2007-04-17 09:21:00
·
answer #3
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Freddie.
2007-04-17 08:51:53
·
answer #4
·
answered by Dr. Quest 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
freddie! Why superior range and powerful vocals. Plus he was the greatest rock singer ever. Paul Rodgers and other vocalist have no chance against him. I really wish he never died because know one will ever replace him or sing like that again.
2007-04-17 18:38:39
·
answer #5
·
answered by Anonymous
·
0⤊
0⤋
Freddie hands down
2007-04-17 08:49:33
·
answer #6
·
answered by Boo Boo Head 4
·
0⤊
0⤋
Freddie. I like to call the new version of Queen, Bad Queen. It's a combo of the names Bad Company and Queen and I really think it reflects what the band sounds like with Paul singing....a bad version of Queen.
2007-04-17 11:02:54
·
answer #7
·
answered by Dinosaur Universe 5
·
0⤊
0⤋
Freddie Mercury is the best singer ever.
2007-04-17 08:54:07
·
answer #8
·
answered by Melissa *aka Memê 6
·
0⤊
1⤋
Both are damn good. Mercury had greater range, but Paul had Mercury in the bluesy/soulful dept. by far. Freddie was moer straight-ahead rock.
2007-04-17 08:50:35
·
answer #9
·
answered by Fonzie T 7
·
0⤊
0⤋
That's a toughie. I like them both, but I think Freddie was probably a bit better. Having said that, since we'll not see a sing-off between them, it's really hard to tell.
2007-04-17 08:48:51
·
answer #10
·
answered by Al_ide 4
·
0⤊
0⤋